NVIDIA Tesla M2070 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 530 OEM
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla M2070 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 530 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M2070
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- 2.9x more texture fill rate: 32.2 GTexel / s vs 11.2 GTexel / s
- 4.7x more pipelines: 448 vs 96
- 3.8x better floating-point performance: 1,030.4 gflops vs 268.8 gflops
- 6x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 74% higher memory clock speed: 3132 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 12.145 vs 5.698
- 5.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 910.236 vs 175.385
- 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.005 vs 0.497
- 5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 46.235 vs 9.27
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 25 July 2011 vs 14 May 2011 |
Texture fill rate | 32.2 GTexel / s vs 11.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 448 vs 96 |
Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops vs 268.8 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 3132 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.145 vs 5.698 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 910.236 vs 175.385 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.005 vs 0.497 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 46.235 vs 9.27 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 530 OEM
- Around 22% higher core clock speed: 700 MHz vs 574 MHz
- 4.5x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 225 Watt
Core clock speed | 700 MHz vs 574 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla M2070
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 530 OEM
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Tesla M2070 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 530 OEM |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.145 | 5.698 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 910.236 | 175.385 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.005 | 0.497 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 46.235 | 9.27 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 94.442 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 671 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 236 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2304 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1064 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1589 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2716 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1064 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1589 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2716 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Tesla M2070 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 530 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi | Fermi |
Code name | GF100 | GF108 |
Launch date | 25 July 2011 | 14 May 2011 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $3,099 | |
Place in performance rating | 1359 | 1360 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 574 MHz | 700 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | 268.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 448 | 96 |
Texture fill rate | 32.2 GTexel / s | 11.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 50 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,100 million | 585 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 248 mm | 145 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 150.3 GB / s | 28.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3132 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |