NVIDIA Tesla M2070 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla M2070 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M2070
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 448 vs 336
- Around 33% better floating-point performance: 1,030.4 gflops vs 772.8 gflops
- 4x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 1536 MB
- 2.1x more memory clock speed: 3132 MHz vs 1500 MHz
- Around 71% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 910.236 vs 533.677
- Around 48% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 46.235 vs 31.229
- Around 43% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 94.442 vs 66.187
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 448 vs 336 |
Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops vs 772.8 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 1536 MB |
Memory clock speed | 3132 MHz vs 1500 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 910.236 vs 533.677 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 46.235 vs 31.229 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 94.442 vs 66.187 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 225 Watt
- Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 14.911 vs 12.145
- Around 67% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.681 vs 1.005
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 575 MHz vs 574 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.911 vs 12.145 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.681 vs 1.005 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla M2070
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Tesla M2070 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.145 | 14.911 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 910.236 | 533.677 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.005 | 1.681 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 46.235 | 31.229 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 94.442 | 66.187 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1877 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 364 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5696 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 296 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 475 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 657 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 296 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 475 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 657 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Tesla M2070 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | GF100 | GF114 |
Launch date | 25 July 2011 | 28 June 2011 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $3,099 | |
Place in performance rating | 1327 | 1353 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 574 MHz | 575 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | 772.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 448 | 336 |
Texture fill rate | 32.2 GTexel / s | 32.2 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,100 million | 1,950 million |
CUDA cores | 336 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Length | 248 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | None |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 API |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 1536 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 150.3 GB / s | 72.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3132 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Optimus | ||
SLI |