NVIDIA Tesla M2070 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla M2070 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M2070

  • Around 33% higher pipelines: 448 vs 336
  • Around 33% better floating-point performance: 1,030.4 gflops vs 772.8 gflops
  • 4x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 1536 MB
  • 2.1x more memory clock speed: 3132 MHz vs 1500 MHz
  • Around 71% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 910.236 vs 533.677
  • Around 48% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 46.235 vs 31.229
  • Around 43% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 94.442 vs 66.187
Specifications (specs)
Pipelines 448 vs 336
Floating-point performance 1,030.4 gflops vs 772.8 gflops
Maximum memory size 6 GB vs 1536 MB
Memory clock speed 3132 MHz vs 1500 MHz
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 910.236 vs 533.677
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 46.235 vs 31.229
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 94.442 vs 66.187

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M

  • 3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 225 Watt
  • Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 14.911 vs 12.145
  • Around 67% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.681 vs 1.005
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 575 MHz vs 574 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt vs 225 Watt
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 14.911 vs 12.145
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.681 vs 1.005

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla M2070
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
12.145
14.911
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
910.236
533.677
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1.005
1.681
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
46.235
31.229
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
94.442
66.187
Name NVIDIA Tesla M2070 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 12.145 14.911
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 910.236 533.677
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.005 1.681
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 46.235 31.229
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 94.442 66.187
PassMark - G3D Mark 1877
PassMark - G2D Mark 364
Geekbench - OpenCL 5696
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 296
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 475
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 657
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 296
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 475
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 657

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Tesla M2070 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M

Essentials

Architecture Fermi Fermi 2.0
Code name GF100 GF114
Launch date 25 July 2011 28 June 2011
Launch price (MSRP) $3,099
Place in performance rating 1327 1353
Type Workstation Laptop

Technical info

Core clock speed 574 MHz 575 MHz
Floating-point performance 1,030.4 gflops 772.8 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 40 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 448 336
Texture fill rate 32.2 GTexel / s 32.2 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 225 Watt 75 Watt
Transistor count 3,100 million 1,950 million
CUDA cores 336

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 MXM-B (3.0)
Length 248 mm
Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin None
Bus support PCI-E 2.0
Laptop size large
SLI options 2-way

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_0) 12 API
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
OpenCL 1.1

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 1536 MB
Memory bandwidth 150.3 GB / s 72.0 GB / s
Memory bus width 384 Bit 192 Bit
Memory clock speed 3132 MHz 1500 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Shared memory 0

Technologies

3D Blu-Ray
3D Gaming
3D Vision
CUDA
DirectX 11 DirectX 11
Optimus
SLI