NVIDIA Tesla M2070 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Tesla M2070 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Tesla M2070
- Environ 33% de pipelines plus haut: 448 versus 336
- Environ 33% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,030.4 gflops versus 772.8 gflops
- 4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 6 GB versus 1536 MB
- 2.1x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 3132 MHz versus 1500 MHz
- Environ 71% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 910.236 versus 533.677
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 46.235 versus 31.229
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 94.442 versus 66.187
Caractéristiques | |
Pipelines | 448 versus 336 |
Performance á point flottant | 1,030.4 gflops versus 772.8 gflops |
Taille de mémore maximale | 6 GB versus 1536 MB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 3132 MHz versus 1500 MHz |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 910.236 versus 533.677 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 46.235 versus 31.229 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 94.442 versus 66.187 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M
- 3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 225 Watt
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 14.911 versus 12.145
- Environ 67% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.681 versus 1.005
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 575 MHz versus 574 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 225 Watt |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.911 versus 12.145 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.681 versus 1.005 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla M2070
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA Tesla M2070 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.145 | 14.911 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 910.236 | 533.677 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.005 | 1.681 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 46.235 | 31.229 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 94.442 | 66.187 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1877 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 364 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5696 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 296 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 475 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 657 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 296 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 475 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 657 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA Tesla M2070 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Fermi | Fermi 2.0 |
Nom de code | GF100 | GF114 |
Date de sortie | 25 July 2011 | 28 June 2011 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $3,099 | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1327 | 1353 |
Genre | Workstation | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 574 MHz | 575 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 1,030.4 gflops | 772.8 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 448 | 336 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 32.2 GTexel / s | 32.2 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 75 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 3,100 million | 1,950 million |
Noyaux CUDA | 336 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Longeur | 248 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | None |
Soutien de bus | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Taille du laptop | large | |
Options SLI | 2-way | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 API |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 6 GB | 1536 MB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 150.3 GB / s | 72.0 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 384 Bit | 192 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 3132 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Optimus | ||
SLI |