AMD FirePro V3900 vs NVIDIA Tesla M2070
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro V3900 and NVIDIA Tesla M2070 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro V3900
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- Around 13% higher core clock speed: 650 MHz vs 574 MHz
- Around 7% higher pipelines: 480 vs 448
- Around 13% lower typical power consumption: 199 Watt vs 225 Watt
Launch date | 7 February 2012 vs 25 July 2011 |
Core clock speed | 650 MHz vs 574 MHz |
Pipelines | 480 vs 448 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 199 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M2070
- 2.1x more texture fill rate: 32.2 GTexel / s vs 15.6 GTexel / s
- Around 65% better floating-point performance: 1,030.4 gflops vs 624.0 gflops
- 6x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 74% higher memory clock speed: 3132 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 12.145 vs 4.646
- 3.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 910.236 vs 279.435
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.005 vs 0.468
- 3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 46.235 vs 13.784
- Around 61% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 94.442 vs 58.58
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 32.2 GTexel / s vs 15.6 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops vs 624.0 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 3132 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.145 vs 4.646 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 910.236 vs 279.435 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.005 vs 0.468 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 46.235 vs 13.784 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 94.442 vs 58.58 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro V3900
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla M2070
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | AMD FirePro V3900 | NVIDIA Tesla M2070 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 640 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 236 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1564 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.646 | 12.145 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 279.435 | 910.236 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.468 | 1.005 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.784 | 46.235 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 58.58 | 94.442 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1311 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1631 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1311 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1631 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD FirePro V3900 | NVIDIA Tesla M2070 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Fermi |
Code name | Turks | GF100 |
Launch date | 7 February 2012 | 25 July 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 1335 | 1336 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $3,099 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 650 MHz | 574 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 624.0 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 480 | 448 |
Texture fill rate | 15.6 GTexel / s | 32.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 199 Watt | 225 Watt |
Transistor count | 716 million | 3,100 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HD сomponent video output | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 2.1 x16 | |
Form factor | Half Height / Half Length | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 168 mm | 248 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 28 GB / s | 150.3 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 3132 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |