NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M vs NVIDIA Tesla M2090

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M and NVIDIA Tesla M2090 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M

NVIDIA Tesla M2090

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
Around 1% higher core clock speed: 657 MHz vs 650 MHz
Around 16% higher texture fill rate: 42.05 GTexel / s vs 36.4 GTexel / s
Around 50% higher pipelines: 768 vs 512
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
4.5x lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 250 Watt

Launch date	30 May 2013 vs 25 July 2011
Core clock speed	657 MHz vs 650 MHz
Texture fill rate	42.05 GTexel / s vs 36.4 GTexel / s
Pipelines	768 vs 512
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	55 Watt vs 250 Watt

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M2090

Around 32% better floating-point performance: 1,331.2 gflops vs 1,009 gflops
3x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 2 GB
Around 85% higher memory clock speed: 3700 MHz vs 2000 MHz
2.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 13075 vs 5578
2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 33.87 vs 15.673
2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1127.187 vs 509.958
2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.833 vs 1.512
Around 88% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 57.33 vs 30.422
2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 119.136 vs 53.992

Specifications (specs)
Floating-point performance	1,331.2 gflops vs 1,009 gflops
Maximum memory size	6 GB vs 2 GB
Memory clock speed	3700 MHz vs 2000 MHz
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	13075 vs 5578
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	33.87 vs 15.673
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1127.187 vs 509.958
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	3.833 vs 1.512
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	57.33 vs 30.422
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	119.136 vs 53.992

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla M2090

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

5578

13075

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

15.673

33.87

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

509.958

1127.187

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1.512

3.833

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

30.422

57.33

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

53.992

119.136

Name	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M	NVIDIA Tesla M2090
PassMark - G3D Mark	1720
PassMark - G2D Mark	232
Geekbench - OpenCL	5578	13075
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	15.673	33.87
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	509.958	1127.187
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.512	3.833
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	30.422	57.33
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	53.992	119.136
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2836
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2728
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3333
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2836
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2728
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3333
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	0

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M	NVIDIA Tesla M2090
Essentials
Architecture	Kepler	Fermi 2.0
Code name	GK106	GF110
Launch date	30 May 2013	25 July 2011
Place in performance rating	1137	1139
Type	Laptop	Workstation
Technical info
Boost clock speed	657 MHz
Core clock speed	657 MHz	650 MHz
CUDA cores	768
Floating-point performance	1,009 gflops	1,331.2 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	768	512
Texture fill rate	42.05 GTexel / s	36.4 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	55 Watt	250 Watt
Transistor count	2,540 million	3,000 million
Video outputs and ports
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support	Up to 3840x2160
eDP 1.2 signal support	Up to 3840x2160
HDCP content protection
HDMI
LVDS signal support	Up to 1920x1200
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming
VGA аnalog display support	Up to 2048x1536
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Bus support	PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size	large
SLI options	1
Length		248 mm
Supplementary power connectors		1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
API support
DirectX	12 API	12.0 (11_0)
OpenCL	1.1
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	6 GB
Memory bandwidth	64.0 GB / s	177.6 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz	3700 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory	0
Standard memory configuration	GDDR5
Technologies
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
Blu-Ray 3D Support
CUDA
Direct Compute
FXAA
GPU Boost
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
Optimus
TXAA