NVIDIA Tesla P4 vs AMD FirePro S9050

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla P4 and AMD FirePro S9050 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla P4

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• Around 69% higher texture fill rate: 170.1 GTexel / s vs 100.8 GTexel / s
• Around 43% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 1792
• Around 69% better floating-point performance: 5,443 gflops vs 3,226 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
• 3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 225 Watt
• Around 9% higher memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 5500 MHz
• Around 79% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8768 vs 4901
• Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 389 vs 369
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 147.62 vs 68.324
• Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1791.761 vs 1463.376
• Around 46% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 9.457 vs 6.491
• Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 99.574 vs 91.133
• Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 523.29 vs 344.551
• Around 62% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11409 vs 7062
• Around 62% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11409 vs 7062

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro S9050

• Around 11% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 810 MHz
• Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
• Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6260 vs 3698
• 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 13032 vs 3341
• Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6260 vs 3698
• 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 13032 vs 3341

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla P4
GPU 2: AMD FirePro S9050

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	8768 4901
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	389 369
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	147.62 68.324
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1791.761 1463.376
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9.457 6.491
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	99.574 91.133
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	523.29 344.551
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11409 7062
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3698 6260
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3341 13032
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11409 7062
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3698 6260
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3341 13032

Compare specifications (specs)