NVIDIA Tesla P4 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla P4 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla P4
- Around 27% higher texture fill rate: 170.1 GTexel / s vs 133.6 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 2560 vs 1280
- Around 27% better floating-point performance: 5,443 gflops vs 4,275 gflops
- Around 60% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 120 Watt
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9097 vs 8160
- Around 22% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 37924 vs 31098
- Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 147.62 vs 111.55
- Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1791.761 vs 1371.266
- Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 9.457 vs 8.49
- 5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 99.574 vs 19.803
- Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 523.29 vs 509.222
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3698 vs 3654
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3698 vs 3654
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 170.1 GTexel / s vs 133.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2560 vs 1280 |
Floating-point performance | 5,443 gflops vs 4,275 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 120 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9097 vs 8160 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 37924 vs 31098 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 147.62 vs 111.55 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1791.761 vs 1371.266 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.457 vs 8.49 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 99.574 vs 19.803 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 523.29 vs 509.222 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 vs 3654 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 vs 3654 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
- Around 86% higher core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 810 MHz
- Around 61% higher boost clock speed: 1708 MHz vs 1063 MHz
- Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 6008 MHz
- Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 444 vs 391
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12645 vs 11409
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 3341
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12645 vs 11409
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 3341
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1506 MHz vs 810 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1708 MHz vs 1063 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz vs 6008 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 444 vs 391 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12645 vs 11409 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3341 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12645 vs 11409 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3341 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla P4
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Tesla P4 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9097 | 8160 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 391 | 444 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 37924 | 31098 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 147.62 | 111.55 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1791.761 | 1371.266 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.457 | 8.49 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 99.574 | 19.803 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 523.29 | 509.222 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11409 | 12645 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 | 3654 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3341 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11409 | 12645 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 | 3654 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3341 | 3359 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3677 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Tesla P4 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
Code name | GP104 | GP106B |
Launch date | 13 September 2016 | 15 August 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 349 | 385 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $237.11 | |
Price now | $229.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 49.49 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1063 MHz | 1708 MHz |
Core clock speed | 810 MHz | 1506 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 5,443 gflops | 4,275 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 16 nm |
Pipelines | 2560 | 1280 |
Texture fill rate | 170.1 GTexel / s | 133.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 120 Watt |
Transistor count | 7,200 million | 4,400 million |
CUDA cores | 1280 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 94 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | DP 1.43, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192.3 GB / s | 192 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 8008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
GameStream | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
Surround | ||
Virtual Reality | ||
VR Ready |