NVIDIA Tesla P4 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Tesla P4 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Tesla P4
- Environ 27% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 170.1 GTexel / s versus 133.6 GTexel / s
- 2x plus de pipelines: 2560 versus 1280
- Environ 27% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 5,443 gflops versus 4,275 gflops
- Environ 60% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 120 Watt
- Environ 33% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 8 GB versus 6 GB
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 9097 versus 8160
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 37924 versus 31098
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 147.62 versus 111.55
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1791.761 versus 1371.266
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 9.457 versus 8.49
- 5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 99.574 versus 19.803
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 523.29 versus 509.222
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3698 versus 3654
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3698 versus 3654
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 170.1 GTexel / s versus 133.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2560 versus 1280 |
Performance á point flottant | 5,443 gflops versus 4,275 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 120 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 6 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9097 versus 8160 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 37924 versus 31098 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 147.62 versus 111.55 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1791.761 versus 1371.266 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.457 versus 8.49 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 99.574 versus 19.803 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 523.29 versus 509.222 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 versus 3654 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 versus 3654 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
- Environ 86% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1506 MHz versus 810 MHz
- Environ 61% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1708 MHz versus 1063 MHz
- Environ 33% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 8008 MHz versus 6008 MHz
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 444 versus 391
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12645 versus 11409
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 versus 3341
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12645 versus 11409
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 versus 3341
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1506 MHz versus 810 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1708 MHz versus 1063 MHz |
Vitesse de mémoire | 8008 MHz versus 6008 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 444 versus 391 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12645 versus 11409 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 versus 3341 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12645 versus 11409 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 versus 3341 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla P4
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA Tesla P4 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9097 | 8160 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 391 | 444 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 37924 | 31098 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 147.62 | 111.55 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1791.761 | 1371.266 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.457 | 8.49 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 99.574 | 19.803 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 523.29 | 509.222 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11409 | 12645 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 | 3654 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3341 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11409 | 12645 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 | 3654 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3341 | 3359 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3677 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA Tesla P4 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
Nom de code | GP104 | GP106B |
Date de sortie | 13 September 2016 | 15 August 2016 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 349 | 385 |
Genre | Workstation | Laptop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $237.11 | |
Prix maintenant | $229.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 49.49 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1063 MHz | 1708 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 810 MHz | 1506 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 5,443 gflops | 4,275 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 16 nm | 16 nm |
Pipelines | 2560 | 1280 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 170.1 GTexel / s | 133.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 120 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 7,200 million | 4,400 million |
Noyaux CUDA | 1280 | |
Température maximale du GPU | 94 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | DP 1.43, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDCP | ||
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 267 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
Taille du laptop | large | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 6 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 192.3 GB / s | 192 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 192 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6008 MHz | 8008 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
GameStream | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
Surround | ||
Virtual Reality | ||
VR Ready |