NVIDIA Tesla P4 vs NVIDIA Quadro K6000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla P4 and NVIDIA Quadro K6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla P4

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• Around 2% higher core clock speed: 810 MHz vs 797 MHz
• Around 18% higher boost clock speed: 1063 MHz vs 902 MHz
• Around 5% better floating-point performance: 5,443 gflops vs 5,196 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
• 3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 225 Watt
• Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8768 vs 8059
• Around 37% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 31511 vs 22920
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 147.62 vs 67.178
• Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 9.457 vs 7.435
• Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 99.574 vs 88.889
• Around 47% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 523.29 vs 355.166

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K6000

• Around 27% higher texture fill rate: 216.5 GTexel / s vs 170.1 GTexel / s
• Around 13% higher pipelines: 2880 vs 2560
• Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
• Around 40% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 543 vs 389
• Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1816.61 vs 1791.761
• Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12657 vs 11409
• Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12657 vs 11409

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla P4
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K6000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	8768 8059
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	389 543
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	31511 22920
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	147.62 67.178
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1791.761 1816.61
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9.457 7.435
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	99.574 88.889
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	523.29 355.166
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11409 12657
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3698 3711
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3341 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11409 12657
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3698 3711
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3341 3356

Compare specifications (specs)