NVIDIA Tesla P4 versus NVIDIA Quadro K6000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Tesla P4 and NVIDIA Quadro K6000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Tesla P4
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 1 mois plus tard
- Environ 2% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 810 MHz versus 797 MHz
- Environ 18% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1063 MHz versus 902 MHz
- Environ 5% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 5,443 gflops versus 5,196 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 16 nm versus 28 nm
- 3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 225 Watt
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 8768 versus 8059
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 31632 versus 22920
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 147.62 versus 67.178
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 9.457 versus 7.435
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 99.574 versus 88.889
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 523.29 versus 355.166
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 13 September 2016 versus 23 July 2013 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 810 MHz versus 797 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1063 MHz versus 902 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 5,443 gflops versus 5,196 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 16 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 225 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8768 versus 8059 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 31632 versus 22920 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 147.62 versus 67.178 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.457 versus 7.435 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 99.574 versus 88.889 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 523.29 versus 355.166 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K6000
- Environ 27% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 216.5 GTexel / s versus 170.1 GTexel / s
- Environ 13% de pipelines plus haut: 2880 versus 2560
- Environ 50% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 12 GB versus 8 GB
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 543 versus 389
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1816.61 versus 1791.761
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12657 versus 11409
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12657 versus 11409
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 216.5 GTexel / s versus 170.1 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2880 versus 2560 |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 12 GB versus 8 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 543 versus 389 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1816.61 versus 1791.761 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12657 versus 11409 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3711 versus 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 versus 3341 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12657 versus 11409 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3711 versus 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 versus 3341 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla P4
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K6000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Tesla P4 | NVIDIA Quadro K6000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8768 | 8059 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 389 | 543 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 31632 | 22920 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 147.62 | 67.178 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1791.761 | 1816.61 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.457 | 7.435 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 99.574 | 88.889 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 523.29 | 355.166 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11409 | 12657 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 | 3711 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3341 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11409 | 12657 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 | 3711 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3341 | 3356 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Tesla P4 | NVIDIA Quadro K6000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
| Nom de code | GP104 | GK110B |
| Date de sortie | 13 September 2016 | 23 July 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 356 | 362 |
| Genre | Workstation | Workstation |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $5,265 | |
| Prix maintenant | $833.98 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 11.34 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1063 MHz | 902 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 810 MHz | 797 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 5,443 gflops | 5,196 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 2880 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 170.1 GTexel / s | 216.5 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 7,200 million | 7,080 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 267 mm | 267 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 2x 6-pin |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 192.3 GB / s | 288.4 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6008 MHz | 6008 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA Tesla P4 avec des autres
NVIDIATesla P4 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7730
NVIDIATesla P4 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 980
NVIDIATesla P4 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 970
NVIDIATesla P4 vs
NVIDIATesla M6
NVIDIATesla P4 vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5300M
NVIDIATesla P4 vs
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile
