NVIDIA Tesla P4 vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla P4 and NVIDIA Quadro M3000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla P4

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• 2.5x more texture fill rate: 170.1 GTexel / s vs 67.2 GTexel / s
• 2.5x more pipelines: 2560 vs 1,024
• 2.5x better floating-point performance: 5,443 gflops vs 2,150 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
• 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
• Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 5012 MHz
• Around 59% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8768 vs 5526
• Around 96% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 31511 vs 16049
• Around 79% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 147.62 vs 82.563
• Around 41% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1791.761 vs 1266.506
• Around 93% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 9.457 vs 4.91
• Around 41% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 99.574 vs 70.779
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 523.29 vs 252.607
• Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11409 vs 7779
• Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11409 vs 7779

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M3000M

• Around 30% higher core clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 810 MHz
• Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 402 vs 389
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3720 vs 3698
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 vs 3341
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3720 vs 3698
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 vs 3341

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla P4
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M3000M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	8768 5526
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	389 402
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	31511 16049
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	147.62 82.563
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1791.761 1266.506
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9.457 4.91
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	99.574 70.779
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	523.29 252.607
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11409 7779
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3698 3720
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3341 3360
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11409 7779
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3698 3720
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3341 3360

Compare specifications (specs)