NVIDIA Titan X Pascal vs NVIDIA Quadro M5000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Titan X Pascal and NVIDIA Quadro M5000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 65% higher core clock speed: 1417 MHz vs 861 MHz
- Around 47% higher boost clock speed: 1531 MHz vs 1038 MHz
- 2.6x more texture fill rate: 342.9 GTexel / s vs 132.9 GTexel / s
- Around 75% higher pipelines: 3584 vs 2048
- 2.6x better floating-point performance: 10,974 gflops vs 4,252 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 51% higher memory clock speed: 10008 MHz vs 6612 MHz
- 2.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 68138 vs 29514
- Around 67% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 165.792 vs 99.169
- 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2368.267 vs 1183.119
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 17.829 vs 7.899
- Around 99% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 992.132 vs 498.551
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3696 vs 3677
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3696 vs 3677
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2 August 2016 vs 29 June 2015 |
Core clock speed | 1417 MHz vs 861 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1531 MHz vs 1038 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 342.9 GTexel / s vs 132.9 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 3584 vs 2048 |
Floating-point performance | 10,974 gflops vs 4,252 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 8 GB |
Memory clock speed | 10008 MHz vs 6612 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 68138 vs 29514 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 165.792 vs 99.169 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2368.267 vs 1183.119 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 17.829 vs 7.899 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 992.132 vs 498.551 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3696 vs 3677 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3333 vs 3324 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3696 vs 3677 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3333 vs 3324 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M5000
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 53.364 vs 21.354
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12524 vs 10841
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12524 vs 10841
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.364 vs 21.354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12524 vs 10841 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12524 vs 10841 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M5000
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Titan X Pascal | NVIDIA Quadro M5000 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 68138 | 29514 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 165.792 | 99.169 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2368.267 | 1183.119 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 17.829 | 7.899 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.354 | 53.364 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 992.132 | 498.551 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10841 | 12524 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3696 | 3677 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3333 | 3324 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10841 | 12524 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3696 | 3677 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3333 | 3324 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 9646 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9369 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 659 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Titan X Pascal | NVIDIA Quadro M5000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | GP102 | GM204 |
Launch date | 2 August 2016 | 29 June 2015 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1,199 | $2,856.99 |
Place in performance rating | 350 | 351 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Price now | $1,498 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 7.47 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1531 MHz | 1038 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1417 MHz | 861 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 10,974 gflops | 4,252 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 3584 | 2048 |
Texture fill rate | 342.9 GTexel / s | 132.9 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 11,800 million | 5,200 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | DVI-I DP DP DP DP 3-pin Stereo, 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort |
Multi-display synchronization | Quadro Sync | |
Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 267 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1 x 6-pin |
SLI options | 1 | |
Width | 2" (5.1 cm) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Shader Model | 5 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 480.4 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 10008 MHz | 6612 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5X | 256 Bit |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
ECC (Error Correcting Code) | ||
High-Performance Video I/O6 | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Desktop Management |