AMD Radeon R5 Graphics vs AMD Radeon R2 Graphics

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 Graphics and AMD Radeon R2 Graphics videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.

AMD Radeon R5 Graphics

AMD Radeon R2 Graphics

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 Graphics

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
2.2x more texture fill rate: 12.13 GTexel / s vs 5.6 GTexel / s
2x more pipelines: 256 vs 128
2.2x better floating-point performance: 388.1 gflops vs 179.2 gflops
2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.331 vs 2.751
Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 119.568 vs 93.854
2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.543 vs 0.263
2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 12.649 vs 6.299
2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 42.459 vs 16.121
2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 966 vs 375
Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1363 vs 1282
2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 966 vs 375
Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1363 vs 1282

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	31 May 2016 vs 27 February 2015
Texture fill rate	12.13 GTexel / s vs 5.6 GTexel / s
Pipelines	256 vs 128
Floating-point performance	388.1 gflops vs 179.2 gflops
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	6.331 vs 2.751
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	119.568 vs 93.854
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.543 vs 0.263
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	12.649 vs 6.299
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	42.459 vs 16.121
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	966 vs 375
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1363 vs 1282
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1915 vs 1912
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	966 vs 375
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1363 vs 1282
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1915 vs 1912

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R2 Graphics

3.5x more core clock speed: 700 MHz vs 200 MHz
2.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7324 vs 2981

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	700 MHz vs 200 MHz
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	7324 vs 2981

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R2 Graphics

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

2981

7324

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

6.331

2.751

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

119.568

93.854

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

0.543

0.263

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

12.649

6.299

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

42.459

16.121

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

966

375

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1363

1282

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1915

1912

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

966

375

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1363

1282

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1915

1912

Name	AMD Radeon R5 Graphics	AMD Radeon R2 Graphics
Geekbench - OpenCL	2981	7324
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	6.331	2.751
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	119.568	93.854
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.543	0.263
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	12.649	6.299
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	42.459	16.121
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	966	375
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1363	1282
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1915	1912
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	966	375
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1363	1282
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1915	1912
PassMark - G3D Mark		250
PassMark - G2D Mark		67

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon R5 Graphics	AMD Radeon R2 Graphics
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 3.0	GCN 2.0
Code name	Wani	Beema
Launch date	31 May 2016	27 February 2015
Place in performance rating	1551	1589
Type	Desktop	Desktop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	800 MHz
Core clock speed	200 MHz	700 MHz
Floating-point performance	388.1 gflops	179.2 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	256	128
Texture fill rate	12.13 GTexel / s	5.6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt	15 Watt
Transistor count	2,410 million	930 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	IGP	IGP
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_0)	12.0 (12_0)
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
Memory
Memory type	System Shared	System Shared