AMD Radeon R5 Graphics versus AMD Radeon R2 Graphics

Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R5 Graphics and AMD Radeon R2 Graphics pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.

AMD Radeon R5 Graphics

versus

AMD Radeon R2 Graphics

Différences

Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R5 Graphics

La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 3 mois plus tard
times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 12.13 GTexel / s versus 5.6 GTexel / s
2x plus de pipelines: 256 versus 128
2.2x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 388.1 gflops versus 179.2 gflops
2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.331 versus 2.751
Environ 27% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 119.568 versus 93.854
2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.543 versus 0.263
2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 12.649 versus 6.299
2.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 42.459 versus 16.121
2.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 966 versus 375
Environ 6% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1363 versus 1282
2.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 966 versus 375
Environ 6% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1363 versus 1282

Caractéristiques
Date de sortie	31 May 2016 versus 27 February 2015
Taux de remplissage de la texture	12.13 GTexel / s versus 5.6 GTexel / s
Pipelines	256 versus 128
Performance á point flottant	388.1 gflops versus 179.2 gflops
Référence
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	6.331 versus 2.751
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	119.568 versus 93.854
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.543 versus 0.263
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	12.649 versus 6.299
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	42.459 versus 16.121
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	966 versus 375
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1363 versus 1282
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1915 versus 1912
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	966 versus 375
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1363 versus 1282
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1915 versus 1912

Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R2 Graphics

3.5x plus de vitesse du noyau: 700 MHz versus 200 MHz
2.5x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 7324 versus 2981

Caractéristiques
Vitesse du noyau	700 MHz versus 200 MHz
Référence
Geekbench - OpenCL	7324 versus 2981

Comparer les références

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R2 Graphics

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

2981

7324

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

6.331

2.751

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

119.568

93.854

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

0.543

0.263

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

12.649

6.299

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

42.459

16.121

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

966

375

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1363

1282

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1915

1912

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

966

375

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1363

1282

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1915

1912

Nom	AMD Radeon R5 Graphics	AMD Radeon R2 Graphics
Geekbench - OpenCL	2981	7324
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	6.331	2.751
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	119.568	93.854
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.543	0.263
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	12.649	6.299
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	42.459	16.121
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	966	375
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1363	1282
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1915	1912
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	966	375
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1363	1282
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1915	1912
PassMark - G3D Mark		250
PassMark - G2D Mark		67

Comparer les caractéristiques

	AMD Radeon R5 Graphics	AMD Radeon R2 Graphics
Essentiel
Architecture	GCN 3.0	GCN 2.0
Nom de code	Wani	Beema
Date de sortie	31 May 2016	27 February 2015
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance	1551	1589
Genre	Desktop	Desktop
Infos techniques
Vitesse augmenté	800 MHz
Vitesse du noyau	200 MHz	700 MHz
Performance á point flottant	388.1 gflops	179.2 gflops
Processus de fabrication	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	256	128
Taux de remplissage de la texture	12.13 GTexel / s	5.6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt	15 Watt
Compte de transistor	2,410 million	930 million
Sorties et ports de vidéo
Connecteurs d’écran	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences
Interface	IGP	IGP
Soutien API
DirectX	12.0 (12_0)	12.0 (12_0)
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
Mémoire
Genre de mémoire	System Shared	System Shared