Intel UHD Graphics 610 vs Intel HD Graphics 4400
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 610 and Intel HD Graphics 4400 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 610
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 22 nm
- Around 33% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 20 Watt
- Around 32% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 693 vs 524
- Around 26% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2697 vs 2143
- Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1071 vs 817
- Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1071 vs 817
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 April 2018 vs 3 September 2013 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 22 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 20 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 693 vs 524 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2697 vs 2143 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1071 vs 817 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1071 vs 817 |
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4400
- Around 17% higher core clock speed: 350 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 10% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- Around 61% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 275 vs 171
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1381 vs 1241
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1381 vs 1241
- Around 79% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3044 vs 1699
- Around 79% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3044 vs 1699
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 350 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 275 vs 171 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1381 vs 1241 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1381 vs 1241 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3044 vs 1699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3044 vs 1699 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 610
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4400
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel UHD Graphics 610 | Intel HD Graphics 4400 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 693 | 524 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 171 | 275 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2697 | 2143 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1071 | 817 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1071 | 817 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1241 | 1381 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1241 | 1381 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1699 | 3044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1699 | 3044 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.844 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 154.696 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.958 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 9.084 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 8.335 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 152 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel UHD Graphics 610 | Intel HD Graphics 4400 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Generation 7.5 |
Code name | Coffee Lake GT1 | Haswell GT2 |
Launch date | 3 April 2018 | 3 September 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 1350 | 1421 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | 1150 MHz |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 350 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 22 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 20 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 392 million |
Floating-point performance | 46 gflops | |
Pipelines | 20 | |
Texture fill rate | 4.6 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |