Reseña de la tarjeta de video AMD Radeon Pro 460
La tarjeta de video Radeon Pro 460 fue lanzada al mercado por AMD; fecha de lanzamiento: 30 October 2016. La tarjeta de video está diseñada para computadoras mobile workstation y basado en la micro-arquitectura GCN 4.0 nombre clave Baffin.
Velocidad de reloj del núcleo - 850 MHz. Impulso de la velocidad del reloj - 907 MHz. Tasa de llenado de texturas - 58.05 GTexel / s. Pipelines - 1024. Desempeño de punto flotante - 1,858 gflops. Tecnología de proceso de manufactura - 14 nm. Número de transistores - 3,000 million. Consumo de energía (TDP) - 35 Watt.
Tipo de memoria: GDDR5. Cantidad de RAM máxima - 4 GB. Ancho del bus de memoria - 128 Bit. Velocidad de reloj de la memoria - 5080 MHz. Ancho de banda de la memoria - 81.28 GB / s. Memoria compartida - 0.
Referencias
| PassMark G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop Face Detection |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop Ocean Surface Simulation |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop T-Rex |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop Video Composition |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop Bitcoin Mining |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 Car Chase Offscreen |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 Manhattan |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 T-Rex |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 Car Chase Offscreen |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 Manhattan |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 T-Rex |
|
|
| Nombre | Valor |
|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3453 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 679 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 15277 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection | 44.089 mPixels/s |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation | 594.914 Frames/s |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex | 3.460 Frames/s |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition | 55.755 Frames/s |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining | 226.930 mHash/s |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen | 4664 Frames |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan | 1842 Frames |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex | 3346 Frames |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen | 4664.000 Fps |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan | 1842.000 Fps |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex | 3346.000 Fps |
Desempeño en juego
1. Resident Evil 7 (2017)
2. Dishonored 2 (2016)
3. Call of Duty Infinite Warfare (2016)
4. Titanfall 2 (2016)
5. Farming Simulator 17 (2016)
6. Battlefield 1 (2016)
7. Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016)
8. Overwatch (2016)
2. Dishonored 2 (2016)
3. Call of Duty Infinite Warfare (2016)
4. Titanfall 2 (2016)
5. Farming Simulator 17 (2016)
6. Battlefield 1 (2016)
7. Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016)
8. Overwatch (2016)
9. Doom (2016)
10. The Division (2016)
11. Far Cry Primal (2016)
12. XCOM 2 (2016)
13. Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)
14. Rainbow Six Siege (2015)
15. Anno 2205 (2015)
16. The Witcher 3 (2015)
17. Sims 4 (2014)
10. The Division (2016)
11. Far Cry Primal (2016)
12. XCOM 2 (2016)
13. Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)
14. Rainbow Six Siege (2015)
15. Anno 2205 (2015)
16. The Witcher 3 (2015)
17. Sims 4 (2014)
Resident Evil 7 (2017)
| Low, 1280x720 | 157.80 |
| High, 1920x1080 | 47.10 |
| Ultra, 1920x1080 | 21.70 |
Dishonored 2 (2016)
| Low, 1280x720 | 61.40 |
| High, 1920x1080 | 26.00 |
| Ultra, 1920x1080 | 22.90 |
Call of Duty Infinite Warfare (2016)
| Low, 1280x720 | 85.50 |
| High, 1920x1080 | 46.30 |
| Ultra, 1920x1080 | 40.60 |
Titanfall 2 (2016)
| Low, 1280x720 | 115.60 |
| High, 1920x1080 | 35.30 |
| Ultra, 1920x1080 | 32.00 |
Farming Simulator 17 (2016)
| Low, 1280x720 | 235.50 |
| High, 1920x1080 | 92.30 |
| Ultra, 1920x1080 | 34.70 |
Battlefield 1 (2016)
| Low, 1280x720 | 132.60 |
| High, 1920x1080 | 40.90 |
| Ultra, 1920x1080 | 35.40 |
Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016)
| Low, 1280x720 | 66.60 |
| High, 1920x1080 | 25.00 |
| Ultra, 1920x1080 | 12.20 |
Overwatch (2016)
| Low, 1280x720 | 201.50 |
| High, 1920x1080 | 106.70 |
| Ultra, 1920x1080 | 48.80 |
Doom (2016)
| Low, 1280x720 | 65.00 |
| High, 1920x1080 | 30.30 |
| Ultra, 1920x1080 | 29.70 |
The Division (2016)
| Low, 1280x720 | 102.80 |
| High, 1920x1080 | 28.90 |
| Ultra, 1920x1080 | 22.30 |
Far Cry Primal (2016)
| Low, 1280x720 | 74.00 |
| Medium, 1920x1080 | 35.00 |
| High, 1920x1080 | 32.00 |
| Ultra, 1920x1080 | 21.00 |
XCOM 2 (2016)
| Low, 1280x720 | 88.70 |
| Medium, 1920x1080 | 31.90 |
| High, 1920x1080 | 21.70 |
| Ultra, 1920x1080 | 9.90 |
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)
| Low, 1024x768 | 76.00 |
| High, 1920x1080 | 25.80 |
| Ultra, 1920x1080 | 20.80 |
Rainbow Six Siege (2015)
| Low, 1024x768 | 150.30 |
| High, 1920x1080 | 55.20 |
| Ultra, 1920x1080 | 45.00 |
Anno 2205 (2015)
| Low, 1024x768 | 120.90 |
| High, 1920x1080 | 25.90 |
| Ultra, 1920x1080 | 8.80 |
The Witcher 3 (2015)
| Low, 1024x768 | 83.30 |
| High, 1920x1080 | 28.90 |
| Ultra, 1920x1080 | 17.40 |
Sims 4 (2014)
| Low, 1024x768 | 164.90 |
| High, 1920x1080 | 69.60 |
| Ultra, 1920x1080 | 63.00 |
Especificaciones
Esenciales |
|
| Arquitectura | GCN 4.0 |
| Nombre clave | Baffin |
| Fecha de lanzamiento | 30 October 2016 |
| Lugar en calificación por desempeño | 636 |
| Tipo | Mobile workstation |
Información técnica |
|
| Impulso de la velocidad de reloj | 907 MHz |
| Velocidad de reloj del núcleo | 850 MHz |
| Desempeño de punto flotante | 1,858 gflops |
| Tecnología de proceso de manufactura | 14 nm |
| Pipelines | 1024 |
| Tasa de llenado de textura | 58.05 GTexel / s |
| Diseño energético térmico (TDP) | 35 Watt |
| Número de transistores | 3,000 million |
Puertos y salidas de video |
|
| Conectores de pantalla | No outputs |
Compatibilidad, dimensiones y requerimientos |
|
| Interfaz | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Tamaño de la laptop | large |
| Conectores de energía complementarios | None |
Soporte de API |
|
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 |
Memoria |
|
| Cantidad máxima de RAM | 4 GB |
| Ancho de banda de la memoria | 81.28 GB / s |
| Ancho de bus de la memoria | 128 Bit |
| Velocidad de reloj de memoria | 5080 MHz |
| Tipo de memoria | GDDR5 |
| Memoria compartida | 0 |
Tecnologías |
|
| DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | |
| FreeSync | |
| HDMI 2.0 | |
Navegación
Elige un GPU
Compara tarjetas de video
Compara la AMD Radeon Pro 460 con otros
AMDRadeon Pro 460 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 1000
AMDRadeon Pro 460 vs
NVIDIAQuadro NVS 210S
AMDRadeon Pro 460 vs
ATIRadeon X550
AMDRadeon Pro 460 vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega M GL
AMDRadeon Pro 460 vs
AMDRadeon RX 550X
AMDRadeon Pro 460 vs
AMDRadeon R9 A375
