AMD FirePro D300 versus NVIDIA Quadro K5000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD FirePro D300 and NVIDIA Quadro K5000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD FirePro D300
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 5 mois plus tard
- Environ 20% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 850 MHz versus 706 MHz
- Environ 75% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 20101 versus 11459
- Environ 63% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 51.183 versus 31.318
- Environ 75% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1192.547 versus 681.141
- Environ 70% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.209 versus 3.062
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 78.541 versus 32.922
- 3.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 242.179 versus 67.311
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 18 January 2014 versus 17 August 2012 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 850 MHz versus 706 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,176 gflops versus 2,169 gflops |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 20101 versus 11459 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 51.183 versus 31.318 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1192.547 versus 681.141 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.209 versus 3.062 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 78.541 versus 32.922 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 242.179 versus 67.311 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K5000
- Environ 33% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 90.37 GTexel / s versus 68 GTexel / s
- Environ 20% de pipelines plus haut: 1536 versus 1280
- Environ 23% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 122 Watt versus 150 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
- Environ 6% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 5400 MHz versus 5080 MHz
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6288 versus 6054
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3680 versus 3397
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6288 versus 6054
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3680 versus 3397
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 90.37 GTexel / s versus 68 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1536 versus 1280 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 122 Watt versus 150 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5400 MHz versus 5080 MHz |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6288 versus 6054 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3680 versus 3397 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 versus 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6288 versus 6054 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3680 versus 3397 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 versus 3351 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD FirePro D300
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K5000
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD FirePro D300 | NVIDIA Quadro K5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 20101 | 11459 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 51.183 | 31.318 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1192.547 | 681.141 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.209 | 3.062 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 78.541 | 32.922 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 242.179 | 67.311 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6054 | 6288 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3397 | 3680 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3352 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6054 | 6288 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3397 | 3680 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3352 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3992 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 432 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1351 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD FirePro D300 | NVIDIA Quadro K5000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
| Nom de code | Pitcairn | GK104 |
| Date de sortie | 18 January 2014 | 17 August 2012 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 704 | 706 |
| Genre | Workstation | Workstation |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $2,499 | |
| Prix maintenant | $1,950 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 2.47 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 850 MHz | 706 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,176 gflops | 2,169 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 1536 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 68 GTexel / s | 90.37 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 122 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 2,800 million | 3,540 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 4x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 242 mm | 267 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 162.6 GB / s | 172.8 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5080 MHz | 5400 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD FirePro D300 avec des autres
AMDFirePro D300 vs
NVIDIAQuadro 7000
AMDFirePro D300 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K5000
AMDFirePro D300 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8550D IGP
AMDFirePro D300 vs
NVIDIAQuadro P2000 Mobile
AMDFirePro D300 vs
AMDRadeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
AMDFirePro D300 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
