AMD FirePro D300 versus NVIDIA Quadro K5000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD FirePro D300 and NVIDIA Quadro K5000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD FirePro D300
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 5 mois plus tard
- Environ 20% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 850 MHz versus 706 MHz
- Environ 76% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 20117 versus 11433
- Environ 63% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 51.183 versus 31.318
- Environ 75% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1192.547 versus 681.141
- Environ 70% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.209 versus 3.062
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 78.541 versus 32.922
- 3.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 242.179 versus 67.311
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 18 January 2014 versus 17 August 2012 |
Vitesse du noyau | 850 MHz versus 706 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 2,176 gflops versus 2,169 gflops |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 20117 versus 11433 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 51.183 versus 31.318 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1192.547 versus 681.141 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.209 versus 3.062 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 78.541 versus 32.922 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 242.179 versus 67.311 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K5000
- Environ 33% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 90.37 GTexel / s versus 68 GTexel / s
- Environ 20% de pipelines plus haut: 1536 versus 1280
- Environ 23% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 122 Watt versus 150 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
- Environ 6% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 5400 MHz versus 5080 MHz
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6288 versus 6054
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3680 versus 3397
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6288 versus 6054
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3680 versus 3397
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 90.37 GTexel / s versus 68 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1536 versus 1280 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 122 Watt versus 150 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5400 MHz versus 5080 MHz |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6288 versus 6054 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3680 versus 3397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 versus 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6288 versus 6054 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3680 versus 3397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 versus 3351 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD FirePro D300
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K5000
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD FirePro D300 | NVIDIA Quadro K5000 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 20117 | 11433 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 51.183 | 31.318 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1192.547 | 681.141 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.209 | 3.062 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 78.541 | 32.922 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 242.179 | 67.311 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6054 | 6288 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3397 | 3680 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3352 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6054 | 6288 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3397 | 3680 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3352 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3994 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 432 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1351 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD FirePro D300 | NVIDIA Quadro K5000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
Nom de code | Pitcairn | GK104 |
Date de sortie | 18 January 2014 | 17 August 2012 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 703 | 705 |
Genre | Workstation | Workstation |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $2,499 | |
Prix maintenant | $1,950 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 2.47 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 850 MHz | 706 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 2,176 gflops | 2,169 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1280 | 1536 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 68 GTexel / s | 90.37 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 122 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 2,800 million | 3,540 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 4x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Longeur | 242 mm | 267 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 162.6 GB / s | 172.8 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5080 MHz | 5400 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |