AMD Radeon R7 250X versus AMD FirePro D300
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R7 250X and AMD FirePro D300 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R7 250X
- Environ 88% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 80 Watt versus 150 Watt
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 versus 3397
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 versus 3397
| Caractéristiques | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt versus 150 Watt |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 versus 3397 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 versus 3397 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3351 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD FirePro D300
- Environ 79% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 68 GTexel / s versus 38 GTexel / s
- 2x plus de pipelines: 1280 versus 640
- Environ 79% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,176 gflops versus 1,216 gflops
- 3.1x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5080 MHz versus 1625 MHz
- Environ 59% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 51.183 versus 32.22
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1192.547 versus 638.532
- Environ 76% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.209 versus 2.963
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 78.541 versus 51.987
- Environ 59% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 242.179 versus 151.963
- Environ 55% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6054 versus 3916
- Environ 55% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6054 versus 3916
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 68 GTexel / s versus 38 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1280 versus 640 |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,176 gflops versus 1,216 gflops |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5080 MHz versus 1625 MHz |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 51.183 versus 32.22 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1192.547 versus 638.532 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.209 versus 2.963 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 78.541 versus 51.987 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 242.179 versus 151.963 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6054 versus 3916 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6054 versus 3916 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 250X
GPU 2: AMD FirePro D300
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon R7 250X | AMD FirePro D300 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2269 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 637 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 32.22 | 51.183 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 638.532 | 1192.547 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.963 | 5.209 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 51.987 | 78.541 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 151.963 | 242.179 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3916 | 6054 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 3397 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3916 | 6054 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 3397 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3351 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 19872 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon R7 250X | AMD FirePro D300 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Nom de code | Cape Verde | Pitcairn |
| Conception | AMD Radeon R7 200 Series | |
| Date de sortie | 13 February 2014 | 18 January 2014 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $99 | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 659 | 660 |
| Prix maintenant | $260.70 | |
| Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 11.25 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1000 MHz | |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,216 gflops | 2,176 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 640 | 1280 |
| Stream Processors | 640 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 38 GTexel / s | 68 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,500 million | 2,800 million |
| Vitesse du noyau | 850 MHz | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort | 4x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 210 mm | 242 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1 x 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 96 GB/s | 162.6 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1625 MHz | 5080 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon R7 250X avec des autres
AMDRadeon R7 250X vs
AMDRadeon HD 6970
AMDRadeon R7 250X vs
IntelIris Pro Graphics 5200
AMDRadeon R7 250X vs
AMDFirePro D300
AMDRadeon R7 250X vs
AMDRadeon R9 M280X
AMDRadeon R7 250X vs
AMDFirePro W6150M
AMDRadeon R7 250X vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
