AMD FirePro W2100 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD FirePro W2100 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD FirePro W2100
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 10 mois plus tard
- 3.3x plus de pipelines: 320 versus 96
- Environ 81% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 435.2 gflops versus 240.0 gflops
- Environ 81% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 869 versus 479
- 2.3x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 318 versus 141
- Environ 67% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 3724 versus 2229
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1494 versus 999
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3346 versus 3257
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1494 versus 999
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3346 versus 3257
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 12 August 2014 versus 1 October 2012 |
| Pipelines | 320 versus 96 |
| Performance á point flottant | 435.2 gflops versus 240.0 gflops |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 869 versus 479 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 318 versus 141 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3724 versus 2229 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1494 versus 999 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 versus 3257 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1494 versus 999 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 versus 3257 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M
- 26.7x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 400 Watt
| Caractéristiques | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 400 Watt |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2333 versus 2329 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2333 versus 2329 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD FirePro W2100
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD FirePro W2100 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 869 | 479 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 318 | 141 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3724 | 2229 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.438 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 289.646 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.991 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.794 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 50.338 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1494 | 999 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2329 | 2333 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 3257 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1494 | 999 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2329 | 2333 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 3257 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1058 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD FirePro W2100 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Nom de code | Oland | GF117 |
| Date de sortie | 12 August 2014 | 1 October 2012 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1211 | 1213 |
| Genre | Workstation | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 680 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 630 MHz | |
| Performance á point flottant | 435.2 gflops | 240.0 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 320 | 96 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 13.6 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 400 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,040 million | 585 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 96 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Compte DisplayPort | 2 | |
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | PCI Express 2.0 |
| Facteur de forme | Low Profile / Half Length | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12 API |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 28.8 GB / s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | n / a | DDR3 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| Powerplay | ||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DirectCompute | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD FirePro W2100 avec des autres
AMDFirePro W2100 vs
ATIRadeon 9800 SE
AMDFirePro W2100 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 645M
AMDFirePro W2100 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 625M
AMDFirePro W2100 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K2000
AMDFirePro W2100 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 950 OEM
AMDFirePro W2100 vs
AMDRadeon R5 430 OEM
