AMD FirePro W4100 versus NVIDIA Quadro K620
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD FirePro W4100 and NVIDIA Quadro K620 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD FirePro W4100
- Environ 12% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 20.16 GTexel / s versus 17.98 GTexel / s
- Environ 33% de pipelines plus haut: 512 versus 384
- 2.2x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 4000 MHz versus 1800 MHz
- Environ 81% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 538.848 versus 297.631
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.631 versus 1.427
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 31.533 versus 15.363
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3399 versus 2490
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3399 versus 2490
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 20.16 GTexel / s versus 17.98 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 512 versus 384 |
Vitesse de mémoire | 4000 MHz versus 1800 MHz |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 538.848 versus 297.631 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.631 versus 1.427 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.533 versus 15.363 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3399 versus 2490 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3399 versus 2490 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K620
- Environ 68% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1058 MHz versus 630 MHz
- Environ 34% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 863.2 gflops versus 645.1 gflops
- Environ 22% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 41 Watt versus 50 Watt
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2231 versus 1514
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 474 versus 455
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 6869 versus 5489
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 22.112 versus 15.65
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 99.125 versus 75.309
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2970 versus 1951
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3329 versus 1620
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2970 versus 1951
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3329 versus 1620
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1058 MHz versus 630 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 863.2 gflops versus 645.1 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 41 Watt versus 50 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2231 versus 1514 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 474 versus 455 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6869 versus 5489 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.112 versus 15.65 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 99.125 versus 75.309 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2970 versus 1951 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3329 versus 1620 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2970 versus 1951 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3329 versus 1620 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD FirePro W4100
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K620
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD FirePro W4100 | NVIDIA Quadro K620 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1514 | 2231 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 455 | 474 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5489 | 6869 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.65 | 22.112 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 538.848 | 297.631 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.631 | 1.427 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.533 | 15.363 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 75.309 | 99.125 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1951 | 2970 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3399 | 2490 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1620 | 3329 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1951 | 2970 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3399 | 2490 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1620 | 3329 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 702 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD FirePro W4100 | NVIDIA Quadro K620 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell |
Nom de code | Cape Verde | GM107 |
Date de sortie | 13 August 2014 | 22 July 2014 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 974 | 975 |
Genre | Workstation | Workstation |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $189.89 | |
Prix maintenant | $189.93 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 15.23 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 630 MHz | 1058 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 645.1 gflops | 863.2 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 384 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 20.16 GTexel / s | 17.98 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 41 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 1,500 million | 1,870 million |
Vitesse augmenté | 1124 MHz | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 4x mini-DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, DVI-I DP |
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Nombre d’écrans á la fois | 4 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
Facteur de forme | Low Profile / Half Length | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Longeur | 171 mm | 160 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Largeur | 1" (2.5 cm) | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 72 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 4000 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | 128 Bit |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AppAcceleration | ||
Powerplay | ||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Desktop Management |