AMD FirePro W5100 versus AMD Radeon R7 260X
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD FirePro W5100 and AMD Radeon R7 260X pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD FirePro W5100
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 mois plus tard
- 2.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 50 Watt versus 115 Watt
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 537 versus 522
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 838.518 versus 804.436
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4397 versus 3845
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3688 versus 3485
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4397 versus 3845
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3688 versus 3485
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 31 March 2014 versus 8 October 2013 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt versus 115 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 537 versus 522 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 838.518 versus 804.436 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4397 versus 3845 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3688 versus 3485 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4397 versus 3845 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3688 versus 3485 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R7 260X
- Environ 38% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 61.6 GTexel / s versus 44.64 GTexel / s
- Environ 17% de pipelines plus haut: 896 versus 768
- Environ 38% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,971 gflops versus 1,428 gflops
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3189 versus 2989
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 43.745 versus 35.15
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.673 versus 3.199
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 64.088 versus 57.354
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 221.539 versus 163.258
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 61.6 GTexel / s versus 44.64 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 896 versus 768 |
Performance á point flottant | 1,971 gflops versus 1,428 gflops |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3189 versus 2989 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 43.745 versus 35.15 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.673 versus 3.199 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 64.088 versus 57.354 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 221.539 versus 163.258 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3356 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD FirePro W5100
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 260X
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD FirePro W5100 | AMD Radeon R7 260X |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2989 | 3189 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 537 | 522 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11635 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 35.15 | 43.745 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 838.518 | 804.436 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.199 | 3.673 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 57.354 | 64.088 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 163.258 | 221.539 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4397 | 3845 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3688 | 3485 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4397 | 3845 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3688 | 3485 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1481 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD FirePro W5100 | AMD Radeon R7 260X | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | GCN 2.0 |
Nom de code | Bonaire | Bonaire |
Date de sortie | 31 March 2014 | 8 October 2013 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 646 | 648 |
Genre | Workstation | Desktop |
Conception | AMD Radeon R7 200 Series | |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $139 | |
Prix maintenant | $239 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 17.15 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 930 MHz | |
Performance á point flottant | 1,428 gflops | 1,971 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 896 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 44.64 GTexel / s | 61.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 115 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 2,080 million | 2,080 million |
Vitesse augmenté | 1000 MHz | |
Stream Processors | 896 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 4x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compte DisplayPort | 4 | |
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Sortie du composant vidéo HD | ||
StereoOutput3D | ||
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
Facteur de forme | Full Height / Half Length | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 171 mm | 170 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1 x 6-pin |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 96 GB / s | 104 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6000 MHz | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync |