AMD FirePro W5130M versus NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD FirePro W5130M and NVIDIA Quadro M1000M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD FirePro W5130M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 mois plus tard
- 1024x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 2 GB / 4 GB
Date de sortie | 2 October 2015 versus 18 August 2015 |
Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 2 GB / 4 GB |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
- Environ 10% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 993 MHz versus 900 MHz
- Environ 16% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1072 MHz versus 925 MHz
- Environ 7% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 31.78 GTexel / s versus 29.6 GTexel / s
- Environ 7% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,017 gflops versus 947.2 gflops
- Environ 25% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 5012 MHz versus 4000 MHz
- 2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2835 versus 1405
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 307 versus 302
- Environ 70% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 8849 versus 5198
- Environ 70% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 38.33 versus 22.588
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 721.18 versus 505.57
- Environ 62% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.056 versus 1.885
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 42.938 versus 30.114
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 137.786 versus 89.784
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4196 versus 1879
- Environ 78% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 versus 2090
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 versus 2582
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4196 versus 1879
- Environ 78% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 versus 2090
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 versus 2582
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 993 MHz versus 900 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1072 MHz versus 925 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 31.78 GTexel / s versus 29.6 GTexel / s |
Performance á point flottant | 1,017 gflops versus 947.2 gflops |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz versus 4000 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2835 versus 1405 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 307 versus 302 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8849 versus 5198 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 38.33 versus 22.588 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 721.18 versus 505.57 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.056 versus 1.885 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 42.938 versus 30.114 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 137.786 versus 89.784 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4196 versus 1879 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 versus 2090 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 2582 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4196 versus 1879 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 versus 2090 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 2582 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD FirePro W5130M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD FirePro W5130M | NVIDIA Quadro M1000M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1405 | 2835 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 302 | 307 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5198 | 8849 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.588 | 38.33 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 505.57 | 721.18 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.885 | 3.056 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.114 | 42.938 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 89.784 | 137.786 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1879 | 4196 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2090 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2582 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1879 | 4196 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2090 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2582 | 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1002 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD FirePro W5130M | NVIDIA Quadro M1000M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell |
Nom de code | Tropo | GM107 |
Date de sortie | 2 October 2015 | 18 August 2015 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1113 | 806 |
Genre | Mobile workstation | Mobile workstation |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $200.89 | |
Prix maintenant | $203.37 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 16.10 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 925 MHz | 1072 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 900 MHz | 993 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 947.2 gflops | 1,017 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 512 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 29.6 GTexel / s | 31.78 GTexel / s |
Compte de transistor | 1,500 million | 1,870 million |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | large |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Shader Model | 5.0 | |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB / 4 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 64 GB / s | 80 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 4000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
Enduro | ||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |