AMD FirePro W7000 versus NVIDIA Quadro 7000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD FirePro W7000 and NVIDIA Quadro 7000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD FirePro W7000
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 mois plus tard
- Environ 46% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 950 MHz versus 651 MHz
- Environ 82% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 76 GTexel / s versus 41.66 GTexel / s
- 2.5x plus de pipelines: 1280 versus 512
- Environ 83% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,432 gflops versus 1,332 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- Environ 41% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 4800 MHz versus 3404 MHz
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 4255 versus 3505
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 539 versus 397
- Environ 60% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 52.467 versus 32.699
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1148.367 versus 1142.156
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.886 versus 3.796
- Environ 65% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 85.472 versus 51.693
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 268.49 versus 110.277
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 13 June 2012 versus 2 May 2012 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 950 MHz versus 651 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 76 GTexel / s versus 41.66 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1280 versus 512 |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,432 gflops versus 1,332 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4800 MHz versus 3404 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4255 versus 3505 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 539 versus 397 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 52.467 versus 32.699 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1148.367 versus 1142.156 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.886 versus 3.796 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 85.472 versus 51.693 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 268.49 versus 110.277 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 versus 3705 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 versus 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 versus 3705 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 versus 3353 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro 7000
- Environ 72% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 204 Watt versus 350 Watt
- Environ 50% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 6 GB versus 4 GB
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 204 Watt versus 350 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 6 GB versus 4 GB |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD FirePro W7000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 7000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD FirePro W7000 | NVIDIA Quadro 7000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4255 | 3505 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 539 | 397 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 17788 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 52.467 | 32.699 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1148.367 | 1142.156 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.886 | 3.796 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 85.472 | 51.693 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 268.49 | 110.277 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6475 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3705 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6475 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3705 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3353 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD FirePro W7000 | NVIDIA Quadro 7000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Nom de code | Pitcairn | GF110 |
| Date de sortie | 13 June 2012 | 2 May 2012 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $899 | $14,499 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 502 | 692 |
| Genre | Workstation | Workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 950 MHz | 651 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,432 gflops | 1,332 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 512 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 76 GTexel / s | 41.66 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 350 Watt | 204 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 2,800 million | 3,000 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 4x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
| Compte DisplayPort | 4 | |
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| StereoOutput3D | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Facteur de forme | Full Height / Full Length | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 242 mm | 248 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 6 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 153.6 GB / s | 177.4 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4800 MHz | 3404 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
