AMD Radeon 625 versus AMD Radeon R7 250E
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon 625 and AMD Radeon R7 250E pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon 625
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 ans 4 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 24.58 GTexel/s versus 25.6 GTexel / s
- Environ 10% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 50 Watt versus 55 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 1 GB
| Date de sortie | 13 May 2019 versus 20 December 2013 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 24.58 GTexel/s versus 25.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt versus 55 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1 GB |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R7 250E
- Environ 10% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 800 MHz versus 730 MHz
- Environ 33% de pipelines plus haut: 512 versus 384
- 5x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 4500 MHz versus 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective)
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 21.562 versus 18.876
- Environ 80% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 582.073 versus 322.556
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.2 versus 1.478
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 38.669 versus 32.22
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 98.052 versus 70.423
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2873 versus 2032
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3698 versus 2920
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 versus 3215
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2873 versus 2032
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3698 versus 2920
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 versus 3215
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 800 MHz versus 730 MHz |
| Pipelines | 512 versus 384 |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4500 MHz versus 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.562 versus 18.876 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 582.073 versus 322.556 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.2 versus 1.478 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.669 versus 32.22 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 98.052 versus 70.423 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2873 versus 2032 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 versus 2920 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 versus 3215 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2873 versus 2032 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 versus 2920 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 versus 3215 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 625
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 250E
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon 625 | AMD Radeon R7 250E |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1077 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 209 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6656 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.876 | 21.562 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 322.556 | 582.073 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.478 | 2.2 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.22 | 38.669 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 70.423 | 98.052 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2032 | 2873 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2920 | 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3215 | 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2032 | 2873 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2920 | 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3215 | 3355 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon 625 | AMD Radeon R7 250E | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Nom de code | Polaris 24 | Cape Verde |
| Date de sortie | 13 May 2019 | 20 December 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1134 | 1067 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $109 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1024 MHz | |
| Unités de Compute | 6 | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 730 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 49.15 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 786.4 GFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 786.4 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 384 | 512 |
| Pixel fill rate | 8.192 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 24.58 GTexel/s | 25.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Performance á point flottant | 819.2 gflops | |
| Compte de transistor | 1,500 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
| Largeur | IGP | |
| Longeur | 168 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.40 GB/s | 72 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) | 4500 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon 625 avec des autres
AMDRadeon 625 vs
NVIDIAGeForce2 Ultra
AMDRadeon 625 vs
ATIRadeon 8500
AMDRadeon 625 vs
NVIDIAGeForce4 420 Go
AMDRadeon 625 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTS 450
AMDRadeon 625 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7750
AMDRadeon 625 vs
AMDRadeon RX 560 (Laptop)
