AMD Radeon 625 versus Intel HD Graphics 630
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon 625 and Intel HD Graphics 630 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon 625
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 8 mois plus tard
- 2.1x plus de vitesse du noyau: 730 MHz versus 350 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 24.58 GTexel/s versus 27.6 GTexel / s
- 16x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 24
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 6656 versus 4614
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 322.556 versus 312.246
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 32.22 versus 20.404
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 70.423 versus 32.567
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2032 versus 1859
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2920 versus 1945
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2032 versus 1859
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2920 versus 1945
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 13 May 2019 versus 30 August 2016 |
Vitesse du noyau | 730 MHz versus 350 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 24.58 GTexel/s versus 27.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 versus 24 |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6656 versus 4614 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 322.556 versus 312.246 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.22 versus 20.404 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 70.423 versus 32.567 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2032 versus 1859 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2920 versus 1945 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2032 versus 1859 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2920 versus 1945 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 630
- Environ 12% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1150 MHz versus 1024 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 3.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 50 Watt
- 32x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 64 GB versus 2 GB
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1108 versus 1077
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 267 versus 209
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.948 versus 18.876
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.795 versus 1.478
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3344 versus 3215
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3344 versus 3215
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse augmenté | 1150 MHz versus 1024 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 50 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 64 GB versus 2 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1108 versus 1077 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 267 versus 209 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.948 versus 18.876 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.795 versus 1.478 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3344 versus 3215 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3344 versus 3215 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 625
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 630
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon 625 | Intel HD Graphics 630 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1077 | 1108 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 209 | 267 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6656 | 4614 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.876 | 27.948 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 322.556 | 312.246 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.478 | 1.795 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.22 | 20.404 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 70.423 | 32.567 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2032 | 1859 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2920 | 1945 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3215 | 3344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2032 | 1859 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2920 | 1945 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3215 | 3344 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 388 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon 625 | Intel HD Graphics 630 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Generation 9.5 |
Nom de code | Polaris 24 | Kaby Lake GT2 |
Date de sortie | 13 May 2019 | 30 August 2016 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1134 | 1235 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1024 MHz | 1150 MHz |
Unités de Compute | 6 | |
Vitesse du noyau | 730 MHz | 350 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 49.15 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 786.4 GFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 786.4 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 384 | 24 |
Pixel fill rate | 8.192 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 24.58 GTexel/s | 27.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 15 Watt |
Performance á point flottant | 441.6 gflops | |
Compte de transistor | 189 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Largeur | IGP | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.3 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 64 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.40 GB/s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) | |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4 |
Mémoire partagé | 1 |