AMD Radeon 625 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 610
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon 625 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon 625
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 7 ans 1 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 24.58 GTexel/s versus 6.5 billion / sec
- 8x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 48
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 1024 MB
- 900x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) versus 1.8 GB/s
- 3.5x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1077 versus 308
- Environ 63% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 209 versus 128
- 5.2x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 6656 versus 1277
- 7.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 18.876 versus 2.471
- 4.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 322.556 versus 77.99
- 6.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.478 versus 0.233
- 5.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 32.22 versus 6.018
- 17.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 70.423 versus 4.053
- 3.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2032 versus 555
- 3.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2920 versus 835
- 2.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3215 versus 1155
- 3.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2032 versus 555
- 3.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2920 versus 835
- 2.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3215 versus 1155
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 13 May 2019 versus 2 April 2012 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 24.58 GTexel/s versus 6.5 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 384 versus 48 |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1024 MB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) versus 1.8 GB/s |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1077 versus 308 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 209 versus 128 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6656 versus 1277 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.876 versus 2.471 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 322.556 versus 77.99 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.478 versus 0.233 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.22 versus 6.018 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 70.423 versus 4.053 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2032 versus 555 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2920 versus 835 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3215 versus 1155 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2032 versus 555 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2920 versus 835 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3215 versus 1155 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 610
- Environ 11% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 810 MHz versus 730 MHz
- Environ 72% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 29 Watt versus 50 Watt
Vitesse du noyau | 810 MHz versus 730 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 29 Watt versus 50 Watt |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 625
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 610
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon 625 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1077 | 308 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 209 | 128 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6656 | 1277 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.876 | 2.471 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 322.556 | 77.99 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.478 | 0.233 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.22 | 6.018 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 70.423 | 4.053 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2032 | 555 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2920 | 835 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3215 | 1155 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2032 | 555 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2920 | 835 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3215 | 1155 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 87 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon 625 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
Nom de code | Polaris 24 | GF119 |
Date de sortie | 13 May 2019 | 2 April 2012 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1134 | 1625 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $39.99 | |
Prix maintenant | $39.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 10.13 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1024 MHz | |
Unités de Compute | 6 | |
Vitesse du noyau | 730 MHz | 810 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 49.15 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 786.4 GFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 786.4 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 384 | 48 |
Pixel fill rate | 8.192 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 24.58 GTexel/s | 6.5 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 29 Watt |
Noyaux CUDA | 48 | |
Performance á point flottant | 155.5 gflops | |
Température maximale du GPU | 102 °C | |
Compte de transistor | 292 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI, VGA |
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Largeur | IGP | |
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Hauteur | 2.7" (6.9 cm) | |
Longeur | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.2 |
Shader Model | 6.3 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 1024 MB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.40 GB/s | 14.4 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) | 1.8 GB/s |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
CUDA |