AMD Radeon HD 6670 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon HD 6670 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 6670
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 mois plus tard
- 2.5x plus de pipelines: 480 versus 192
- Environ 11% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 768.0 gflops versus 691.2 gflops
- Environ 76% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 66 Watt versus 116 Watt
- Environ 2% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1050 MHz versus 1026 MHz
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3348 versus 3322
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3348 versus 3322
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 19 April 2011 versus 15 March 2011 |
Pipelines | 480 versus 192 |
Performance á point flottant | 768.0 gflops versus 691.2 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 66 Watt versus 116 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1050 MHz versus 1026 MHz |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3348 versus 3322 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3348 versus 3322 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti
- Environ 50% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 28.8 billion / sec versus 19.2 GTexel / s
- 2.2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1557 versus 724
- Environ 55% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 382 versus 247
- 3x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 5750 versus 1905
- 3.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 18.461 versus 4.861
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 354.392 versus 235.463
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.125 versus 0.463
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 18.511 versus 15.918
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 41.941 versus 38.551
- Environ 59% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2488 versus 1564
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3351 versus 3260
- Environ 59% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2488 versus 1564
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3351 versus 3260
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 28.8 billion / sec versus 19.2 GTexel / s |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1557 versus 724 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 382 versus 247 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5750 versus 1905 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.461 versus 4.861 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 354.392 versus 235.463 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.125 versus 0.463 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.511 versus 15.918 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 41.941 versus 38.551 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2488 versus 1564 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3351 versus 3260 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2488 versus 1564 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3351 versus 3260 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 6670
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon HD 6670 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 724 | 1557 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 247 | 382 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1905 | 5750 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.861 | 18.461 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 235.463 | 354.392 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.463 | 1.125 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.918 | 18.511 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 38.551 | 41.941 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1564 | 2488 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3260 | 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3348 | 3322 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1564 | 2488 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3260 | 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3348 | 3322 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 322 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon HD 6670 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Fermi 2.0 |
Nom de code | Turks | GF116 |
Conception | AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series | |
Date de sortie | 19 April 2011 | 15 March 2011 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $99 | $149 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1255 | 1019 |
Prix maintenant | $102.99 | $287.59 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 13.12 | 7.49 |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 800 MHz | |
Performance á point flottant | 768.0 gflops | 691.2 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 480 | 192 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 19.2 GTexel / s | 28.8 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 66 Watt | 116 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 716 million | 1,170 million |
Vitesse du noyau | 1800 MHz | |
Noyaux CUDA | 192 | |
Température maximale du GPU | 100 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Two Dual Link DVI-IMini HDMI, 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCIe 2.0 x16 | 16x PCI-E 2.0 |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Longeur | 168 mm | 8.25" (21 cm) |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | One 6-pin |
Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Options SLI | 2-way | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 11 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.2 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 64 GB/s | 98.4 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1050 MHz | 1026 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
SLI |