AMD Radeon HD 7570 versus ATI Radeon HD 5570
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon HD 7570 and ATI Radeon HD 5570 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 7570
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 20% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 15.6 GTexel / s versus 13 GTexel / s
- Environ 20% de pipelines plus haut: 480 versus 400
- Environ 20% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 624 gflops versus 520.0 gflops
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 1 GB
- Environ 60% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1600 MHz versus 1000 MHz
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 614 versus 478
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 256 versus 198
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 1550 versus 1370
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.874 versus 4.393
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 259.769 versus 235.572
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.487 versus 0.454
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 14.033 versus 11.345
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 57.396 versus 49.016
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1389 versus 1160
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2724 versus 1883
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1389 versus 1160
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2724 versus 1883
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 5 January 2012 versus 11 October 2011 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 15.6 GTexel / s versus 13 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 480 versus 400 |
Performance á point flottant | 624 gflops versus 520.0 gflops |
Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1600 MHz versus 1000 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 614 versus 478 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 256 versus 198 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1550 versus 1370 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.874 versus 4.393 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 259.769 versus 235.572 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.487 versus 0.454 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 14.033 versus 11.345 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 57.396 versus 49.016 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1389 versus 1160 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2724 versus 1883 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1389 versus 1160 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2724 versus 1883 |
Raisons pour considerer le ATI Radeon HD 5570
- Environ 54% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 39 Watt versus 60 Watt
Caractéristiques | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 39 Watt versus 60 Watt |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 versus 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 versus 3355 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 7570
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5570
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon HD 7570 | ATI Radeon HD 5570 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 614 | 478 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 256 | 198 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1550 | 1370 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.874 | 4.393 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 259.769 | 235.572 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.487 | 0.454 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 14.033 | 11.345 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 57.396 | 49.016 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1389 | 1160 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2724 | 1883 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3360 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1389 | 1160 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2724 | 1883 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3360 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon HD 7570 | ATI Radeon HD 5570 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | TeraScale 2 |
Nom de code | Turks | Turks |
Date de sortie | 5 January 2012 | 11 October 2011 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1254 | 1369 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Conception | ATI Radeon HD 5000 Series | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 650 MHz | 650 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 624 gflops | 520.0 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 480 | 400 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 15.6 GTexel / s | 13 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt | 39 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 716 million | 716 million |
Vitesse augmenté | 650 MHz | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Longeur | 165 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 64 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1600 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3, GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity |