AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 640
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 7 mois plus tard
- Environ 30% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 50 Watt versus 65 Watt
- Environ 1% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1800 MHz versus 1782 MHz
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 5763 versus 3762
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 14.771 versus 11.448
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 285.896 versus 206.777
- Environ 54% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.219 versus 0.792
- Environ 70% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 24.949 versus 14.637
- 3.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 72.899 versus 20.86
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2540 versus 2375
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 versus 3328
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2540 versus 2375
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 versus 3328
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 8 January 2013 versus 5 June 2012 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt versus 65 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz versus 1782 MHz |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5763 versus 3762 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.771 versus 11.448 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 285.896 versus 206.777 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.219 versus 0.792 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.949 versus 14.637 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 72.899 versus 20.86 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2540 versus 2375 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 versus 3328 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2540 versus 2375 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 versus 3328 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 640
- Environ 24% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 902 MHz versus 730 MHz
- Environ 54% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 28.86 GTexel / s versus 18.72 GTexel / s
- Environ 16% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 692.7 gflops versus 599.0 gflops
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1173 versus 942
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 295 versus 285
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2134 versus 1759
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2134 versus 1759
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 902 MHz versus 730 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 28.86 GTexel / s versus 18.72 GTexel / s |
Performance á point flottant | 692.7 gflops versus 599.0 gflops |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1173 versus 942 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 295 versus 285 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2134 versus 1759 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2134 versus 1759 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 640
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 942 | 1173 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 285 | 295 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5763 | 3762 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.771 | 11.448 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 285.896 | 206.777 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.219 | 0.792 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.949 | 14.637 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 72.899 | 20.86 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1759 | 2134 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2540 | 2375 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3328 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1759 | 2134 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2540 | 2375 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3328 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1565 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
Nom de code | Oland | GK107 |
Date de sortie | 8 January 2013 | 5 June 2012 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1162 | 1163 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $99 | |
Prix maintenant | $59.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 25.25 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 780 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 730 MHz | 902 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 599.0 gflops | 692.7 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 18.72 GTexel / s | 28.86 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 65 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 1,040 million | 1,270 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Longeur | 145 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 28.8 GB / s | 28.51 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | 1782 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR3 | DDR3 |