AMD Radeon HD 8950 OEM versus AMD Radeon HD 6950
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon HD 8950 OEM and AMD Radeon HD 6950 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 8950 OEM
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 0 mois plus tard
- Environ 16% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 925 MHz versus 800 MHz
- Environ 47% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 103.6 GTexel / s versus 70.4 GTexel / s
- Environ 27% de pipelines plus haut: 1792 versus 1408
- Environ 47% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 3,315 gflops versus 2,252.8 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- 2.5x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 200 Watt versus 500 Watt
- Environ 50% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 3 GB versus 2 GB
- 4x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5000 MHz versus 1250 MHz
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2789 versus 2608
- 2.3x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 13773 versus 6105
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 40.311 versus 16.999
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.328 versus 1.659
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 64.205 versus 49.698
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4396 versus 3652
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3705 versus 2523
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4396 versus 3652
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3705 versus 2523
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 8 January 2013 versus 14 December 2010 |
Vitesse augmenté | 925 MHz versus 800 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 103.6 GTexel / s versus 70.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1792 versus 1408 |
Performance á point flottant | 3,315 gflops versus 2,252.8 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt versus 500 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 3 GB versus 2 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5000 MHz versus 1250 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2789 versus 2608 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 13773 versus 6105 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 40.311 versus 16.999 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.328 versus 1.659 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 64.205 versus 49.698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4396 versus 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3705 versus 2523 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4396 versus 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3705 versus 2523 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 6950
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 439 versus 364
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 899.056 versus 795.334
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 251.203 versus 181.508
- 3.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 11657 versus 3348
- 3.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 11657 versus 3348
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 439 versus 364 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 899.056 versus 795.334 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 251.203 versus 181.508 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 11657 versus 3348 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 11657 versus 3348 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8950 OEM
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6950
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon HD 8950 OEM | AMD Radeon HD 6950 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2789 | 2608 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 364 | 439 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 13773 | 6105 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 40.311 | 16.999 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 795.334 | 899.056 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.328 | 1.659 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 64.205 | 49.698 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 181.508 | 251.203 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4396 | 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3705 | 2523 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3348 | 11657 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4396 | 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3705 | 2523 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3348 | 11657 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon HD 8950 OEM | AMD Radeon HD 6950 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale 3 |
Nom de code | Tahiti | Cayman |
Date de sortie | 8 January 2013 | 14 December 2010 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 719 | 721 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Conception | AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series | |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $299 | |
Prix maintenant | $89.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 45.34 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 925 MHz | 800 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 850 MHz | |
Performance á point flottant | 3,315 gflops | 2,252.8 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 1792 | 1408 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 103.6 GTexel / s | 70.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt | 500 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 4,313 million | 2,640 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Longeur | 267 mm | 267 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 6-pin | 2x 6-pin |
Soutien de bus | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 3 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 240.0 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5000 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire |