AMD Radeon Pro 455 versus AMD Radeon HD 6970
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Pro 455 and AMD Radeon HD 6970 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro 455
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 ans 10 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 40 nm
- 15.7x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 35 Watt versus 550 Watt
- 3.7x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5080 MHz versus 1375 MHz
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3113 versus 2836
- Environ 64% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 705 versus 429
- Environ 79% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 33.484 versus 18.676
- Environ 56% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.854 versus 1.835
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 30 October 2016 versus 14 December 2010 |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt versus 550 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5080 MHz versus 1375 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3113 versus 2836 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 705 versus 429 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.484 versus 18.676 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.854 versus 1.835 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 versus 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 versus 3358 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 6970
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 84.5 GTexel / s versus 41.04 GTexel / s
- 2x plus de pipelines: 1536 versus 768
- 2.1x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,703.4 gflops versus 1,313 gflops
- 3.2x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 35739 versus 11291
- Environ 60% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 920.398 versus 573.646
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 52.219 versus 44.793
- Environ 84% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 273.175 versus 148.673
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5372 versus 4146
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 versus 1762
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5372 versus 4146
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 versus 1762
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 84.5 GTexel / s versus 41.04 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1536 versus 768 |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,703.4 gflops versus 1,313 gflops |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 35739 versus 11291 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 920.398 versus 573.646 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 52.219 versus 44.793 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 273.175 versus 148.673 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5372 versus 4146 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 versus 1762 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5372 versus 4146 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 versus 1762 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 455
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6970
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon Pro 455 | AMD Radeon HD 6970 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3113 | 2836 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 705 | 429 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11291 | 35739 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.484 | 18.676 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 573.646 | 920.398 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.854 | 1.835 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 44.793 | 52.219 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 148.673 | 273.175 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4146 | 5372 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1762 | 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4146 | 5372 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1762 | 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3358 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon Pro 455 | AMD Radeon HD 6970 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | TeraScale 3 |
| Nom de code | Baffin | Cayman |
| Date de sortie | 30 October 2016 | 14 December 2010 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 671 | 676 |
| Genre | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Conception | AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series | |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $369 | |
| Prix maintenant | $94.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 48.01 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 855 MHz | |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,313 gflops | 2,703.4 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 768 | 1536 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 41.04 GTexel / s | 84.5 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 550 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 3,000 million | 2,640 million |
| Vitesse augmenté | 880 MHz | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Longeur | 267 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 81.28 GB / s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5080 MHz | 1375 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | DDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HDMI 2.0 | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon Pro 455 avec des autres
AMDRadeon Pro 455 vs
ATIRadeon X1550
AMDRadeon Pro 455 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7150 + nForce 630i
AMDRadeon Pro 455 vs
AMDFirePro W5170M
AMDRadeon Pro 455 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M600M
AMDRadeon Pro 455 vs
AMDRadeon R7 430 OEM
AMDRadeon Pro 455 vs
IntelIris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
