AMD Radeon Pro 455 versus Intel HD Graphics P4600
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Pro 455 and Intel HD Graphics P4600 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro 455
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 4 mois plus tard
- 2.4x plus de vitesse du noyau: 855 MHz versus 350 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 22 nm
- 2.4x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 35 Watt versus 84 Watt
- 6.2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3113 versus 506
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 705 versus 491
- 3.3x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 11003 versus 3372
- 3.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 33.484 versus 8.915
- 3.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 573.646 versus 146.479
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.854 versus 1.178
- 4.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 44.793 versus 10.689
- 22.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 148.673 versus 6.64
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 30 October 2016 versus 1 June 2013 |
Vitesse du noyau | 855 MHz versus 350 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 22 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt versus 84 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3113 versus 506 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 705 versus 491 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11003 versus 3372 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.484 versus 8.915 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 573.646 versus 146.479 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.854 versus 1.178 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 44.793 versus 10.689 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 148.673 versus 6.64 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 versus 3345 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 versus 3345 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics P4600
- Environ 90% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3342 versus 1762
- Environ 90% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3342 versus 1762
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3342 versus 1762 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3342 versus 1762 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 455
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics P4600
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon Pro 455 | Intel HD Graphics P4600 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3113 | 506 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 705 | 491 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11003 | 3372 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.484 | 8.915 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 573.646 | 146.479 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.854 | 1.178 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 44.793 | 10.689 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 148.673 | 6.64 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4146 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1762 | 3342 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3345 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4146 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1762 | 3342 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3345 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon Pro 455 | Intel HD Graphics P4600 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Generation 7.5 |
Nom de code | Baffin | Haswell GT2 |
Date de sortie | 30 October 2016 | 1 June 2013 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 683 | 1009 |
Genre | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 855 MHz | 350 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 1,313 gflops | |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 22 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 41.04 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 84 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 3,000 million | 392 million |
Vitesse augmenté | 1250 MHz | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | IGP |
Taille du laptop | large | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 81.28 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5080 MHz | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
HDMI 2.0 |