AMD Radeon Pro 555 versus Intel HD Graphics P4600
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Pro 555 and Intel HD Graphics P4600 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro 555
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 0 mois plus tard
- 2.4x plus de vitesse du noyau: 850 MHz versus 350 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 22 nm
- Environ 12% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 84 Watt
- 5.2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3141 versus 605
- 3.4x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 11389 versus 3346
- 3.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 31.301 versus 8.915
- 3.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 572.795 versus 146.479
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.83 versus 1.178
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 26.388 versus 10.689
- 24.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 162.706 versus 6.64
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 5 June 2017 versus 1 June 2013 |
Vitesse du noyau | 850 MHz versus 350 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 22 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 84 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3141 versus 605 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11389 versus 3346 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 31.301 versus 8.915 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 572.795 versus 146.479 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.83 versus 1.178 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 26.388 versus 10.689 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 162.706 versus 6.64 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 versus 3345 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 versus 3345 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics P4600
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 963 versus 659
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3342 versus 2221
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3342 versus 2221
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 963 versus 659 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3342 versus 2221 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3342 versus 2221 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 555
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics P4600
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon Pro 555 | Intel HD Graphics P4600 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3141 | 605 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 659 | 963 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11389 | 3346 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 31.301 | 8.915 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 572.795 | 146.479 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.83 | 1.178 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 26.388 | 10.689 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 162.706 | 6.64 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4042 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2221 | 3342 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 | 3345 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4042 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2221 | 3342 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 | 3345 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon Pro 555 | Intel HD Graphics P4600 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Generation 7.5 |
Nom de code | Polaris 21 | Haswell GT2 |
Date de sortie | 5 June 2017 | 1 June 2013 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 710 | 684 |
Genre | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 850 MHz | 350 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 1,306 gflops | |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 22 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 40.8 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 84 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 3,000 million | 392 million |
Vitesse augmenté | 1250 MHz | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | IGP |
Taille du laptop | large | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 81.6 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5100 MHz | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
HDMI 2.0 |