AMD Radeon Pro 560 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Pro 560 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro 560
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 5 mois plus tard
- Environ 14% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 907 MHz versus 797 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 33% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 100 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
- Environ 2% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 5080 MHz versus 5000 MHz
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 724 versus 555
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 15828 versus 12012
- Environ 66% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 41.388 versus 24.986
- Environ 62% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.837 versus 2.362
- 3.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 189.085 versus 55.394
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 18 April 2017 versus 8 November 2013 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 907 MHz versus 797 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 100 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5080 MHz versus 5000 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 724 versus 555 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 15828 versus 12012 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 41.388 versus 24.986 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.837 versus 2.362 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 189.085 versus 55.394 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 versus 3347 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 versus 3347 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition
- Environ 54% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 89.26 GTexel / s versus 58.05 GTexel / s
- Environ 31% de pipelines plus haut: 1344 versus 1024
- Environ 15% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,142 gflops versus 1,858 gflops
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3594 versus 3475
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 826.477 versus 614.695
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 35.269 versus 31.274
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6030 versus 4695
- Environ 60% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3657 versus 2280
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6030 versus 4695
- Environ 60% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3657 versus 2280
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 89.26 GTexel / s versus 58.05 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1344 versus 1024 |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,142 gflops versus 1,858 gflops |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3594 versus 3475 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 826.477 versus 614.695 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.269 versus 31.274 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6030 versus 4695 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3657 versus 2280 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6030 versus 4695 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3657 versus 2280 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 560
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon Pro 560 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3475 | 3594 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 724 | 555 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 15828 | 12012 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 41.388 | 24.986 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 614.695 | 826.477 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.837 | 2.362 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.274 | 35.269 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 189.085 | 55.394 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4695 | 6030 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2280 | 3657 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 | 3347 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4695 | 6030 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2280 | 3657 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 | 3347 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon Pro 560 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Kepler |
| Nom de code | Polaris 21 | GK104 |
| Date de sortie | 18 April 2017 | 8 November 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 624 | 625 |
| Genre | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 907 MHz | 797 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,858 gflops | 2,142 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 1344 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 58.05 GTexel / s | 89.26 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 3,000 million | 3,540 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 81.28 GB / s | 160.0 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5080 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HDMI 2.0 | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon Pro 560 avec des autres
AMDRadeon Pro 560 vs
ATIFirePro V9800
AMDRadeon Pro 560 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6990
AMDRadeon Pro 560 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition
AMDRadeon Pro 560 vs
AMDRadeon RX 540 OEM
AMDRadeon Pro 560 vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega M GL
AMDRadeon Pro 560 vs
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4
