AMD Radeon Pro 560X versus AMD Radeon HD 7870 XT
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Pro 560X and AMD Radeon HD 7870 XT pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro 560X
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 ans 7 mois plus tard
- Environ 9% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1004 MHz versus 925 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 2.5x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 185 Watt
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 711 versus 661
- Environ 91% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5367 versus 2810
- Environ 91% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5367 versus 2810
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 16 July 2018 versus 19 November 2012 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1004 MHz versus 925 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 185 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 711 versus 661 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5367 versus 2810 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5367 versus 2810 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 7870 XT
- Environ 50% de pipelines plus haut: 1536 versus 1024
- Environ 18% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 6000 MHz versus 5080 MHz
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 4470 versus 3678
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 65.399 versus 48.494
- Environ 81% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1230.47 versus 679.583
- Environ 61% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.371 versus 3.96
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 78.519 versus 62.405
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 345.793 versus 247.728
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3264 versus 2495
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3264 versus 2495
| Caractéristiques | |
| Pipelines | 1536 versus 1024 |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6000 MHz versus 5080 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4470 versus 3678 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 65.399 versus 48.494 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1230.47 versus 679.583 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.371 versus 3.96 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 78.519 versus 62.405 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 345.793 versus 247.728 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3264 versus 2495 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 versus 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3264 versus 2495 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 versus 3351 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 560X
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7870 XT
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon Pro 560X | AMD Radeon HD 7870 XT |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3678 | 4470 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 711 | 661 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 17556 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 48.494 | 65.399 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 679.583 | 1230.47 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.96 | 6.371 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 62.405 | 78.519 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 247.728 | 345.793 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5367 | 2810 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2495 | 3264 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3354 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5367 | 2810 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2495 | 3264 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3354 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1745 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon Pro 560X | AMD Radeon HD 7870 XT | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Nom de code | Polaris 21 | Tahiti |
| Date de sortie | 16 July 2018 | 19 November 2012 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 551 | 548 |
| Genre | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $270 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 1004 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 1536 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 185 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 3,000 million | 4,313 million |
| Vitesse augmenté | 975 MHz | |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,995 gflops | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 93.6 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 2x 6-pin |
| Longeur | 267 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5080 MHz | 6000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 192.0 GB / s | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon Pro 560X avec des autres
AMDRadeon Pro 560X vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 540
AMDRadeon Pro 560X vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 4850
AMDRadeon Pro 560X vs
AMDRadeon HD 7870 XT
AMDRadeon Pro 560X vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960A
AMDRadeon Pro 560X vs
AMDRadeon R9 370X
AMDRadeon Pro 560X vs
NVIDIAP104-100
