AMD Radeon Pro 570 versus AMD Radeon RX 570
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Pro 570 and AMD Radeon RX 570 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro 570
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 mois plus tard
- Environ 8% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1000 MHz versus 926-1168 MHz
- 702.7x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 3,584 gflops versus 5.1 TFLOPs
- Environ 25% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 120 Watt versus 150 Watt
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 697 versus 626
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 89.457 versus 79.029
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 5 June 2017 versus 18 April 2017 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1000 MHz versus 926-1168 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 3,584 gflops versus 5.1 TFLOPs |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt versus 150 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 697 versus 626 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 89.457 versus 79.029 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 versus 3346 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 versus 3346 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 570
- Environ 9% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1206-1244 MHz versus 1105 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 159.23 GTexel/s versus 112.0 GTexel / s
- Environ 14% de pipelines plus haut: 2048 versus 1792
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 4 GB
- Environ 3% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 7000 MHz versus 6800 MHz
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 6967 versus 6337
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 36107 versus 30214
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 105.688 versus 74.958
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1083.926 versus 1070.209
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.251 versus 6.94
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 520.089 versus 436.958
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9172 versus 7664
- Environ 55% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3624 versus 2340
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9172 versus 7664
- Environ 55% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3624 versus 2340
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1206-1244 MHz versus 1105 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 159.23 GTexel/s versus 112.0 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2048 versus 1792 |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 4 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz versus 6800 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6967 versus 6337 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 36107 versus 30214 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 105.688 versus 74.958 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1083.926 versus 1070.209 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.251 versus 6.94 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 520.089 versus 436.958 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9172 versus 7664 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3624 versus 2340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9172 versus 7664 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3624 versus 2340 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 570
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 570
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon Pro 570 | AMD Radeon RX 570 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6337 | 6967 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 697 | 626 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 30214 | 36107 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 74.958 | 105.688 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1070.209 | 1083.926 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.94 | 8.251 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 89.457 | 79.029 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 436.958 | 520.089 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7664 | 9172 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2340 | 3624 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3346 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7664 | 9172 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2340 | 3624 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3346 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 880 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon Pro 570 | AMD Radeon RX 570 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Nom de code | Polaris 20 | Polaris 20 |
| Date de sortie | 5 June 2017 | 18 April 2017 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 433 | 405 |
| Genre | Workstation | Desktop, Laptop |
| Conception | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
| Génération GCN | 4th Gen | |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $169 | |
| Prix maintenant | $149.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 59.00 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1105 MHz | 1206-1244 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1000 MHz | 926-1168 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 3,584 gflops | 5.1 TFLOPs |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Pipelines | 1792 | 2048 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 112.0 GTexel / s | 159.23 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 5,700 million | 5,700 million |
| Débit de remplissage de pixels | 39.81 GP/s | |
| Render output units | 32 | |
| Stream Processors | 2048 | |
| Texture Units | 128 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 241 mm | 241 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 217.6 GB / s | 224 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 256 bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6800 MHz | 7000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||

