AMD Radeon Pro 575 versus AMD Radeon HD 7970
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Pro 575 and AMD Radeon HD 7970 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro 575
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 ans 5 mois plus tard
- Environ 19% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 140.8 GTexel / s versus 118.4 GTexel / s
- Environ 19% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 4,506 gflops versus 3,789 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 2.5x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 120 Watt versus 300 Watt
- Environ 33% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 4 GB versus 3 GB
- 4.9x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 6800 MHz versus 1375 MHz
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 34757 versus 34541
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 86.154 versus 84.381
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 539.686 versus 481.76
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9613 versus 9448
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9613 versus 9448
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 5 June 2017 versus 22 December 2011 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 140.8 GTexel / s versus 118.4 GTexel / s |
| Performance á point flottant | 4,506 gflops versus 3,789 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt versus 300 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 3 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6800 MHz versus 1375 MHz |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 34757 versus 34541 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 86.154 versus 84.381 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 539.686 versus 481.76 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9613 versus 9448 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 versus 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9613 versus 9448 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 versus 3350 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 7970
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1389.754 versus 1090.128
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.872 versus 7.88
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 101.929 versus 98.349
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3704 versus 2814
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3704 versus 2814
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1389.754 versus 1090.128 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.872 versus 7.88 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 101.929 versus 98.349 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3704 versus 2814 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3704 versus 2814 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 575
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7970
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon Pro 575 | AMD Radeon HD 7970 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 34757 | 34541 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 86.154 | 84.381 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1090.128 | 1389.754 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.88 | 8.872 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 98.349 | 101.929 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 539.686 | 481.76 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9613 | 9448 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2814 | 3704 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9613 | 9448 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2814 | 3704 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | 3350 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2276 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon Pro 575 | AMD Radeon HD 7970 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Nom de code | Polaris 20 | Tahiti |
| Date de sortie | 5 June 2017 | 22 December 2011 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 486 | 483 |
| Genre | Workstation | Desktop |
| Conception | AMD Radeon HD 7000 Series | |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $549 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 1096 MHz | |
| Performance á point flottant | 4,506 gflops | 3,789 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 2048 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 140.8 GTexel / s | 118.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 300 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 5,700 million | 4,313 million |
| Vitesse augmenté | 925 MHz | |
| Stream Processors | 2048 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 241 mm | 274 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 2.1 x16 | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 3 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 217.6 GB / s | 264 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6800 MHz | 1375 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| FreeSync | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon Pro 575 avec des autres
AMDRadeon Pro 575 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9650M GS
AMDRadeon Pro 575 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9800 GX2
AMDRadeon Pro 575 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 370M
AMDRadeon Pro 575 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7970
AMDRadeon Pro 575 vs
NVIDIAGRID K240Q
AMDRadeon Pro 575 vs
AMDRadeon R9 M295X
