AMD Radeon Pro SSG versus AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Pro SSG and AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro SSG
- Environ 15% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1440 MHz versus 1247 MHz
- 967.6x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 12,288 gflops versus 12.7 TFLOPs
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 16 GB versus 8 GB
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3178.443 versus 2129.009
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 16.732 versus 14.889
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 173.59 versus 129.271
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7766 versus 3717
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7766 versus 3717
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1440 MHz versus 1247 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 12,288 gflops versus 12.7 TFLOPs |
Taille de mémore maximale | 16 GB versus 8 GB |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3178.443 versus 2129.009 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.732 versus 14.889 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 173.59 versus 129.271 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7766 versus 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7766 versus 3717 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
- Environ 3% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1546 MHz versus 1500 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 395.80 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel / s
- 2x plus de pipelines: 8192 versus 4096
- Environ 19% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 295 Watt versus 350 Watt
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 14394 versus 10972
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 800 versus 588
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 195.478 versus 170.923
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1328.033 versus 1231.051
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14744 versus 11029
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14744 versus 11029
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse augmenté | 1546 MHz versus 1500 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 395.80 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 8192 versus 4096 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 295 Watt versus 350 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14394 versus 10972 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 800 versus 588 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 195.478 versus 170.923 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1328.033 versus 1231.051 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14744 versus 11029 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14744 versus 11029 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro SSG
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon Pro SSG | AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10972 | 14394 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 588 | 800 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 170.923 | 195.478 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3178.443 | 2129.009 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.732 | 14.889 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 173.59 | 129.271 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1231.051 | 1328.033 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11029 | 14744 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7766 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11029 | 14744 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7766 | 3717 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 204168 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7522 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon Pro SSG | AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | GCN 5.0 |
Nom de code | Vega 10 | Vega 10 |
Date de sortie | 8 August 2017 | 7 August 2017 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $6,999 | $499 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 158 | 170 |
Genre | Workstation | Desktop |
Conception | Radeon RX Vega Series | |
Prix maintenant | $449.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 41.07 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1500 MHz | 1546 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1440 MHz | 1247 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 12,288 gflops | 12.7 TFLOPs |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 4096 | 8192 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 384.0 GTexel / s | 395.80 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 350 Watt | 295 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 12,500 million | 12,500 million |
Unités de Compute | 64 | |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 840 GFLOPs | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 26.7 TFLOPs | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 13.4 TFLOPs | |
Pixel fill rate | 98.90 GP/s | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Stream Processors | 4096 | |
Texture Units | 256 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 6x mini-DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 267 mm | 279 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 750 Watt | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 16 GB | 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 483.8 GB / s | 483.8 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 2048 Bit | 2048 bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1890 MHz | 1890 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | HBM2 | HBM2 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
FreeSync | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready | ||
ZeroCore |