NVIDIA TITAN V versus AMD Radeon Pro SSG
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA TITAN V and AMD Radeon Pro SSG pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA TITAN V
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 mois plus tard
- Environ 21% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 465.6 GTexel / s versus 384.0 GTexel / s
- Environ 25% de pipelines plus haut: 5120 versus 4096
- Environ 21% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 14,899 gflops versus 12,288 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 14 nm
- Environ 40% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 250 Watt versus 350 Watt
- Environ 80% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 19748 versus 10972
- Environ 54% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 906 versus 588
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 270.561 versus 170.923
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3583.136 versus 3178.443
- Environ 84% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 30.857 versus 16.732
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1504.373 versus 1231.051
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15401 versus 11029
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15401 versus 11029
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 7 December 2017 versus 8 August 2017 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 465.6 GTexel / s versus 384.0 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 5120 versus 4096 |
| Performance á point flottant | 14,899 gflops versus 12,288 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 14 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt versus 350 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 19748 versus 10972 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 906 versus 588 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 270.561 versus 170.923 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3583.136 versus 3178.443 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 30.857 versus 16.732 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1504.373 versus 1231.051 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15401 versus 11029 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15401 versus 11029 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro SSG
- Environ 20% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1440 MHz versus 1200 MHz
- Environ 3% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1500 MHz versus 1455 MHz
- Environ 33% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 16 GB versus 12 GB
- Environ 11% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1890 MHz versus 1700 MHz
- 8.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 173.59 versus 20.669
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7766 versus 3716
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7766 versus 3716
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1440 MHz versus 1200 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1500 MHz versus 1455 MHz |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 16 GB versus 12 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1890 MHz versus 1700 MHz |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 173.59 versus 20.669 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7766 versus 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7766 versus 3716 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA TITAN V
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro SSG
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA TITAN V | AMD Radeon Pro SSG |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 19748 | 10972 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 906 | 588 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 155759 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 270.561 | 170.923 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3583.136 | 3178.443 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 30.857 | 16.732 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.669 | 173.59 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1504.373 | 1231.051 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15401 | 11029 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 7766 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4193 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15401 | 11029 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 7766 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4193 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3584 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA TITAN V | AMD Radeon Pro SSG | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Volta | GCN 5.0 |
| Nom de code | GV100 | Vega 10 |
| Date de sortie | 7 December 2017 | 8 August 2017 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $2,999 | $6,999 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 157 | 160 |
| Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1455 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1200 MHz | 1440 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 14,899 gflops | 12,288 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Pipelines | 5120 | 4096 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 465.6 GTexel / s | 384.0 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 350 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 21,100 million | 12,500 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 6x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 267 mm | 267 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 12 GB | 16 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 652.8 GB / s | 483.8 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 3072 Bit | 2048 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1700 MHz | 1890 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | HBM2 | HBM2 |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA TITAN V avec des autres
NVIDIATITAN V vs
AMDRadeon Pro SSG
NVIDIATITAN V vs
NVIDIATesla V100 PCIe 32 GB
NVIDIATITAN V vs
AMDRadeon Pro W5700X
NVIDIATITAN V vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 1010
NVIDIATITAN V vs
NVIDIARTX A2000 Embedded
NVIDIATITAN V vs
AMDRadeon 760M
