AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 versus AMD Radeon Pro 580
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 and AMD Radeon Pro 580 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 9 mois plus tard
- Environ 9% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1200 MHz versus 1100 MHz
- Environ 8% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1300 MHz versus 1200 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 249.6 GTexel/s versus 193.0 GTexel / s
- Environ 33% de pipelines plus haut: 3072 versus 2304
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 11289 versus 7753
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 53783 versus 40265
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 135.416 versus 109.521
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3063.269 versus 1206.829
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 12.678 versus 9.88
- Environ 73% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 883.876 versus 511.984
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11925 versus 10113
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3947 versus 2900
- 3.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 10411 versus 3353
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11925 versus 10113
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3947 versus 2900
- 3.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 10411 versus 3353
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 19 March 2019 versus 5 June 2017 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1200 MHz versus 1100 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1300 MHz versus 1200 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 249.6 GTexel/s versus 193.0 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 3072 versus 2304 |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11289 versus 7753 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 53783 versus 40265 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 135.416 versus 109.521 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3063.269 versus 1206.829 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.678 versus 9.88 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 883.876 versus 511.984 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11925 versus 10113 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3947 versus 2900 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 10411 versus 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11925 versus 10113 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3947 versus 2900 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 10411 versus 3353 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro 580
- 83.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 150 Watt versus 12500 million
- 8.6x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 6780 MHz versus 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective)
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 943 versus 788
Caractéristiques | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt versus 12500 million |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6780 MHz versus 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective) |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 943 versus 788 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro 580
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 | AMD Radeon Pro 580 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11289 | 7753 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 788 | 943 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 53783 | 40265 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 135.416 | 109.521 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3063.269 | 1206.829 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.678 | 9.88 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 883.876 | 511.984 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11925 | 10113 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3947 | 2900 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 10411 | 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11925 | 10113 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3947 | 2900 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 10411 | 3353 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 117.944 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 | AMD Radeon Pro 580 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Vega 10 PRO | GCN 4.0 |
Nom de code | Greenland | Polaris 20 |
Génération GCN | GCN 5.0 | |
Date de sortie | 19 March 2019 | 5 June 2017 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 232 | 319 |
Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1300 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1200 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 499.2 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.97 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.987 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 3072 | 2304 |
Pixel fill rate | 83.20 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 249.6 GTexel/s | 193.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 12500 million | 150 Watt |
Performance á point flottant | 6,175 gflops | |
Compte de transistor | 5,700 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 241 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.3 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
Mémoire de la bande passante haute (HBM) | ||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 402.4 GB/s | 256.0 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 2048 bit | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective) | 6780 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) |