AMD Radeon Pro W5500 versus AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop)
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Pro W5500 and AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop) pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro W5500
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 6 mois plus tard
- Environ 9% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1187 MHz versus 1090 MHz
- Environ 17% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1400 MHz versus 1200 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 123.2 GTexel/s versus 67.2 GTexel / s
- Environ 57% de pipelines plus haut: 1408 versus 896
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 7 nm versus 14 nm
- 4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 2 GB
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 130.7 versus 55.048
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2361.73 versus 969.655
- 2.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 13.641 versus 4.655
- Environ 76% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 135.462 versus 76.807
- 3.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 774.974 versus 239.111
- Environ 79% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12184 versus 6821
- 105.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12184 versus 115.4
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 10 Feb 2020 versus 8 August 2016 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1187 MHz versus 1090 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1400 MHz versus 1200 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 123.2 GTexel/s versus 67.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1408 versus 896 |
| Processus de fabrication | 7 nm versus 14 nm |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 2 GB |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 130.7 versus 55.048 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2361.73 versus 969.655 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.641 versus 4.655 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.462 versus 76.807 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 774.974 versus 239.111 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12184 versus 6821 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12184 versus 115.4 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop)
- Environ 79% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 70 Watt versus 125 Watt
- 4x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 7000 MHz versus 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective)
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 70 Watt versus 125 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz versus 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5500
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop)
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon Pro W5500 | AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop) |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 130.7 | 55.048 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2361.73 | 969.655 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.641 | 4.655 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.462 | 76.807 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 774.974 | 239.111 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12184 | 6821 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3463 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12184 | 115.4 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3463 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4102 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 574 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 17646 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1723 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon Pro W5500 | AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop) | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Nom de code | Navi 14 | Baffin |
| Date de sortie | 10 Feb 2020 | 8 August 2016 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $399 | $86 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 330 | 551 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Conception | Radeon RX 400 Series | |
| Génération GCN | 4th Gen | |
| Prix maintenant | $179.50 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 33.86 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1400 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1187 MHz | 1090 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 7 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 246.4 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.885 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.942 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1408 | 896 |
| Pixel fill rate | 44.80 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 123.2 GTexel/s | 67.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt | 70 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 6400 million | 3,000 million |
| Unités de Compute | 14 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 2.2 TFLOPs | |
| GPU Power | 35-48 Watt | |
| Stream Processors | 896 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 4x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Longeur | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 170 mm |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 350 Watt | 400 Watt |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Largeur | Single-slot | |
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 224 GB/s | 112 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 128 bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) | 7000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 2.0 | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon Pro W5500 avec des autres
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
ATIRadeon X1950 CrossFire Edition
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
AMDRadeon RX 580
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega M GH
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
NVIDIAT550 Mobile
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
NVIDIACMP 30HX
