AMD Radeon Pro W5500 versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Pro W5500 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro W5500
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 0 mois plus tard
- Environ 34% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1187 MHz versus 885 MHz
- Environ 18% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1400 MHz versus 1185 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 7 nm versus 12 nm
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2361.73 versus 1935.102
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 135.462 versus 111.023
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 10 Feb 2020 versus 29 January 2019 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1187 MHz versus 885 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1400 MHz versus 1185 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 7 nm versus 12 nm |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2361.73 versus 1935.102 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.462 versus 111.023 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
- Environ 64% de pipelines plus haut: 2304 versus 1408
- Environ 9% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 115 Watt versus 125 Watt
- 8x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective)
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 168.08 versus 130.7
- Environ 67% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 22.794 versus 13.641
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1001.496 versus 774.974
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 17328 versus 12184
- 2.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8912 versus 3463
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8055 versus 3355
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 17328 versus 12184
- 2.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8912 versus 3463
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8055 versus 3355
| Caractéristiques | |
| Pipelines | 2304 versus 1408 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt versus 125 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 168.08 versus 130.7 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 22.794 versus 13.641 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1001.496 versus 774.974 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17328 versus 12184 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8912 versus 3463 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8055 versus 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17328 versus 12184 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8912 versus 3463 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8055 versus 3355 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5500
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon Pro W5500 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 130.7 | 168.08 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2361.73 | 1935.102 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.641 | 22.794 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.462 | 111.023 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 774.974 | 1001.496 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12184 | 17328 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3463 | 8912 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 8055 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12184 | 17328 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3463 | 8912 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 8055 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11744 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 483 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 78224 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6839 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon Pro W5500 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Turing |
| Nom de code | Navi 14 | TU106 |
| Date de sortie | 10 Feb 2020 | 29 January 2019 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $399 | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 330 | 178 |
| Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1400 MHz | 1185 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1187 MHz | 885 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 246.4 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.885 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.942 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1408 | 2304 |
| Pixel fill rate | 44.80 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 123.2 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt | 115 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 6400 million | 10,800 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 4x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Largeur | Single-slot | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 224 GB/s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) | 14000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon Pro W5500 avec des autres
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
ATIRadeon X1950 CrossFire Edition
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
AMDRadeon RX 580
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega M GH
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
NVIDIAT550 Mobile
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
NVIDIACMP 30HX
