AMD Radeon Pro W5500 versus NVIDIA Quadro P620
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Pro W5500 and NVIDIA Quadro P620 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro W5500
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 0 mois plus tard
- Environ 3% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1400 MHz versus 1354 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 123.2 GTexel/s versus 46.56 GTexel / s
- 2.8x plus de pipelines: 1408 versus 512
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 7 nm versus 14 nm
- 4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 2 GB
- 3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 130.7 versus 43.877
- 3.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2361.73 versus 773.248
- 4.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 13.641 versus 3.082
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 135.462 versus 53.425
- 4.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 774.974 versus 184.343
- 3.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12184 versus 3575
- 3.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12184 versus 3575
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 10 Feb 2020 versus 1 February 2018 |
Vitesse augmenté | 1400 MHz versus 1354 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 123.2 GTexel/s versus 46.56 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1408 versus 512 |
Processus de fabrication | 7 nm versus 14 nm |
Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 2 GB |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 130.7 versus 43.877 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2361.73 versus 773.248 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.641 versus 3.082 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.462 versus 53.425 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 774.974 versus 184.343 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12184 versus 3575 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12184 versus 3575 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro P620
- Environ 7% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1266 MHz versus 1187 MHz
- 3.1x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 40 Watt versus 125 Watt
- 2.9x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5012 MHz versus 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective)
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3881 versus 3463
- Environ 98% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6631 versus 3355
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3881 versus 3463
- Environ 98% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6631 versus 3355
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1266 MHz versus 1187 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt versus 125 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz versus 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3881 versus 3463 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6631 versus 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3881 versus 3463 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6631 versus 3355 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5500
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P620
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon Pro W5500 | NVIDIA Quadro P620 |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 130.7 | 43.877 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2361.73 | 773.248 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.641 | 3.082 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.462 | 53.425 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 774.974 | 184.343 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12184 | 3575 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3463 | 3881 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 6631 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12184 | 3575 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3463 | 3881 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 6631 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3625 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 559 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12475 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon Pro W5500 | NVIDIA Quadro P620 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Pascal |
Nom de code | Navi 14 | GP107 |
Date de sortie | 10 Feb 2020 | 1 February 2018 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $399 | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 330 | 578 |
Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Prix maintenant | $176.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 25.53 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1400 MHz | 1354 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1187 MHz | 1266 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 7 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 246.4 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.885 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.942 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1408 | 512 |
Pixel fill rate | 44.80 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 123.2 GTexel/s | 46.56 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt | 40 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 6400 million | 3,300 million |
Performance á point flottant | 1,490 gflops | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 4x DisplayPort | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 145 mm |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | None |
Largeur | Single-slot | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 224 GB/s | 64.19 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) | 5012 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |