AMD Radeon Pro W6600 versus AMD Radeon Pro W5500
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Pro W6600 and AMD Radeon Pro W5500 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro W6600
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 3 mois plus tard
- Environ 85% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 2200 MHz versus 1187 MHz
- 2.1x plus de vitesse augmenté: 2903 MHz versus 1400 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 325.1 GTexel/s versus 123.2 GTexel/s
- Environ 27% de pipelines plus haut: 1792 versus 1408
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 270.025 versus 130.7
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4980.223 versus 2361.73
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 20.735 versus 13.641
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1054.582 versus 774.974
- Environ 71% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20826 versus 12184
- 4.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 15778 versus 3463
- 12.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 42325 versus 3355
- Environ 71% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20826 versus 12184
- 4.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 15778 versus 3463
- 12.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 42325 versus 3355
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 8 Jun 2021 versus 10 Feb 2020 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 2200 MHz versus 1187 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 2903 MHz versus 1400 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 325.1 GTexel/s versus 123.2 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 1792 versus 1408 |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 270.025 versus 130.7 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4980.223 versus 2361.73 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 20.735 versus 13.641 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1054.582 versus 774.974 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20826 versus 12184 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 15778 versus 3463 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 42325 versus 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20826 versus 12184 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 15778 versus 3463 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 42325 versus 3355 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro W5500
- Environ 4% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 125 Watt versus 130 Watt
| Caractéristiques | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt versus 130 Watt |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.462 versus 135.303 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W6600
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro W5500
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon Pro W6600 | AMD Radeon Pro W5500 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 15615 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 981 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 72837 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 270.025 | 130.7 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4980.223 | 2361.73 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 20.735 | 13.641 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.303 | 135.462 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1054.582 | 774.974 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20826 | 12184 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 15778 | 3463 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 42325 | 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20826 | 12184 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 15778 | 3463 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 42325 | 3355 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon Pro W6600 | AMD Radeon Pro W5500 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Nom de code | Navi 23 | Navi 14 |
| Date de sortie | 8 Jun 2021 | 10 Feb 2020 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $649 | $399 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 65 | 340 |
| Genre | Desktop | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 2903 MHz | 1400 MHz |
| Unités de Compute | 28 | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 2200 MHz | 1187 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 650.3 GFLOPS (1:16) | 246.4 GFLOPS (1:16) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 20.81 TFLOPS (2:1) | 7.885 TFLOPS (2:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 10.40 TFLOPS | 3.942 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 1792 | 1408 |
| Pixel fill rate | 185.8 GPixel/s | 44.80 GPixel/s |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 325.1 GTexel/s | 123.2 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | 125 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 11060 million | 6400 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 4x DisplayPort | 4x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Facteur de forme | Single-slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
| Longeur | 241 mm (9.5 inches) | 267 mm (10.5 inches) |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 300 Watt | 350 Watt |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Largeur | Single-slot | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 224 GB/s | 224 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 128 bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon Pro W6600 avec des autres
AMDRadeon Pro W6600 vs
AMDRadeon Pro V520
AMDRadeon Pro W6600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3070 Ti
AMDRadeon Pro W6600 vs
NVIDIARTX A5500 Mobile
AMDRadeon Pro W6600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 8 GB
AMDRadeon Pro W6600 vs
NVIDIARTX 3500 Ada Generation
AMDRadeon Pro W6600 vs
AMDRadeon RX 7600 XT
