AMD Radeon Pro W6600 vs AMD Radeon Pro W5500
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD Radeon Pro W6600 und AMD Radeon Pro W5500 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon Pro W6600
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 1 Jahr(e) 3 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 85% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:2200 MHz vs 1187 MHz
- 2.1x mehr Boost-Taktfrequenz: 2903 MHz vs 1400 MHz
- 2.6x mehr Texturfüllrate: 325.1 GTexel/s vs 123.2 GTexel/s
- Etwa 27% höhere Leitungssysteme: 1792 vs 1408
- 2.1x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 270.025 vs 130.7
- 2.1x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4980.223 vs 2361.73
- Etwa 52% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 20.735 vs 13.641
- Etwa 36% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1054.582 vs 774.974
- Etwa 71% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20826 vs 12184
- 4.6x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 15778 vs 3463
- 12.6x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 42325 vs 3355
- Etwa 71% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20826 vs 12184
- 4.6x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 15778 vs 3463
- 12.6x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 42325 vs 3355
| Spezifikationen | |
| Startdatum | 8 Jun 2021 vs 10 Feb 2020 |
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 2200 MHz vs 1187 MHz |
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 2903 MHz vs 1400 MHz |
| Texturfüllrate | 325.1 GTexel/s vs 123.2 GTexel/s |
| Leitungssysteme | 1792 vs 1408 |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 270.025 vs 130.7 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4980.223 vs 2361.73 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 20.735 vs 13.641 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1054.582 vs 774.974 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20826 vs 12184 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 15778 vs 3463 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 42325 vs 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20826 vs 12184 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 15778 vs 3463 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 42325 vs 3355 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon Pro W5500
- Etwa 4% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 125 Watt vs 130 Watt
| Spezifikationen | |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 125 Watt vs 130 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.462 vs 135.303 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W6600
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro W5500
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro W6600 | AMD Radeon Pro W5500 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 15383 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 947 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 73128 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 270.025 | 130.7 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4980.223 | 2361.73 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 20.735 | 13.641 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.303 | 135.462 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1054.582 | 774.974 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20826 | 12184 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 15778 | 3463 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 42325 | 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20826 | 12184 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 15778 | 3463 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 42325 | 3355 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| AMD Radeon Pro W6600 | AMD Radeon Pro W5500 | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur | RDNA 2.0 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Codename | Navi 23 | Navi 14 |
| Startdatum | 8 Jun 2021 | 10 Feb 2020 |
| Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $649 | $399 |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 63 | 324 |
| Typ | Desktop | |
Technische Info |
||
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 2903 MHz | 1400 MHz |
| Berechnungseinheiten | 28 | |
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 2200 MHz | 1187 MHz |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 650.3 GFLOPS (1:16) | 246.4 GFLOPS (1:16) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 20.81 TFLOPS (2:1) | 7.885 TFLOPS (2:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 10.40 TFLOPS | 3.942 TFLOPS |
| Leitungssysteme | 1792 | 1408 |
| Pixel-Füllrate | 185.8 GPixel/s | 44.80 GPixel/s |
| Texturfüllrate | 325.1 GTexel/s | 123.2 GTexel/s |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 130 Watt | 125 Watt |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 11060 million | 6400 million |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
| Display-Anschlüsse | 4x DisplayPort | 4x DisplayPort |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
| Formfaktor | Single-slot | |
| Schnittstelle | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
| Länge | 241 mm (9.5 inches) | 267 mm (10.5 inches) |
| Empfohlene Systemleistung (PSU) | 300 Watt | 350 Watt |
| Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Breite | Single-slot | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
| Maximale RAM-Belastung | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Speicherbandbreite | 224 GB/s | 224 GB/s |
| Breite des Speicherbusses | 128 bit | 128 bit |
| Speichertaktfrequenz | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) |
| Speichertyp | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
