AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 versus AMD FirePro S7150
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 and AMD FirePro S7150 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 9 mois plus tard
- Environ 3% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 121.6 GTexel / s versus 117.6 GTexel / s
- Environ 3% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 3,892 gflops versus 3,763 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 150 Watt
- 2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 5584 versus 2727
- Environ 67% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 777 versus 465
- 3.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 87.861 versus 27.544
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1362.14 versus 570.969
- 8.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.025 versus 0.687
- 4.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 106.141 versus 23.637
- 2.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1565 versus 583
- 2.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1565 versus 583
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 18 November 2016 versus 1 February 2016 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 121.6 GTexel / s versus 117.6 GTexel / s |
Performance á point flottant | 3,892 gflops versus 3,763 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 150 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5584 versus 2727 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 777 versus 465 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 87.861 versus 27.544 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1362.14 versus 570.969 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.025 versus 0.687 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 106.141 versus 23.637 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1565 versus 583 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1565 versus 583 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD FirePro S7150
- Environ 47% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1050 MHz versus 713 MHz
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 29623 versus 25596
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6147 versus 5579
- 2.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4359 versus 1691
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6147 versus 5579
- 2.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4359 versus 1691
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1050 MHz versus 713 MHz |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 29623 versus 25596 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6147 versus 5579 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4359 versus 1691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6147 versus 5579 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4359 versus 1691 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100
GPU 2: AMD FirePro S7150
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 | AMD FirePro S7150 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5584 | 2727 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 777 | 465 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 25596 | 29623 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 87.861 | 27.544 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1362.14 | 570.969 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.025 | 0.687 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 106.141 | 23.637 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 250.267 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5579 | 6147 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1691 | 4359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1565 | 583 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5579 | 6147 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1691 | 4359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1565 | 583 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 | AMD FirePro S7150 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 3.0 |
Nom de code | Ellesmere | Tonga |
Date de sortie | 18 November 2016 | 1 February 2016 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $499 | $2,399 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 470 | 634 |
Prix maintenant | $349.99 | |
Genre | Workstation | Workstation |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 19.34 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1086 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 713 MHz | 1050 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 3,892 gflops | 3,763 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1792 | 1792 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 121.6 GTexel / s | 117.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 150 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 5,700 million | 5,000 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 4x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 6-pin |
Longeur | 241 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 160.0 GB / s | 160.0 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |