AMD Radeon R5 Graphics versus Intel HD Graphics 520
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R5 Graphics and Intel HD Graphics 520 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 8 mois plus tard
- 10.7x plus de pipelines: 256 versus 24
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 42.459 versus 28.182
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 966 versus 951
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 966 versus 951
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 31 May 2016 versus 1 September 2015 |
| Pipelines | 256 versus 24 |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 42.459 versus 28.182 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 966 versus 951 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 966 versus 951 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 520
- Environ 50% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 300 MHz versus 200 MHz
- Environ 31% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1050 MHz versus 800 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 3993 versus 2981
- 3.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 21.852 versus 6.331
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 143.083 versus 119.568
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.243 versus 0.543
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 12.958 versus 12.649
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1462 versus 1363
- Environ 74% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3337 versus 1915
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1462 versus 1363
- Environ 74% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3337 versus 1915
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz versus 200 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1050 MHz versus 800 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3993 versus 2981 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.852 versus 6.331 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 143.083 versus 119.568 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.243 versus 0.543 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.958 versus 12.649 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1462 versus 1363 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3337 versus 1915 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1462 versus 1363 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3337 versus 1915 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 520
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon R5 Graphics | Intel HD Graphics 520 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2981 | 3993 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.331 | 21.852 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 119.568 | 143.083 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.543 | 1.243 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.649 | 12.958 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 42.459 | 28.182 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 966 | 951 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1363 | 1462 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1915 | 3337 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 966 | 951 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1363 | 1462 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1915 | 3337 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 864 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 209 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 326 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon R5 Graphics | Intel HD Graphics 520 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Generation 9.0 |
| Nom de code | Wani | Skylake GT2 |
| Date de sortie | 31 May 2016 | 1 September 2015 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1551 | 1381 |
| Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 800 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 200 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 388.1 gflops | |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Pipelines | 256 | 24 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 12.13 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 2,410 million | 189 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| Genre de mémoire | System Shared | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 |
| RAM maximale | 32 GB | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | |
| Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon R5 Graphics avec des autres
AMDRadeon R5 Graphics vs
NVIDIAGeForce 8300 GS
AMDRadeon R5 Graphics vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9600M GS
AMDRadeon R5 Graphics vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 620
AMDRadeon R5 Graphics vs
AMDRadeon HD 8330E
AMDRadeon R5 Graphics vs
AMDRadeon HD 8280E
AMDRadeon R5 Graphics vs
IntelUHD Graphics 605
