AMD Radeon R5 M230 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R5 M230 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R5 M230
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 9 mois plus tard
- Environ 6% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 825 MHz versus 775 MHz
- Environ 38% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 17.1 GTexel / s versus 12.4 GTexel / s
- 3.3x plus de pipelines: 320 versus 96
- 2.3x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 547.2 gflops versus 240.0 gflops
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 128 versus 119
- Environ 77% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 4596 versus 2602
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.593 versus 6.901
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.852 versus 0.587
- Environ 56% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 15.789 versus 10.121
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 49.196 versus 22.755
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2401 versus 2035
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2401 versus 2035
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 7 January 2014 versus 1 April 2013 |
Vitesse du noyau | 825 MHz versus 775 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 17.1 GTexel / s versus 12.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 320 versus 96 |
Performance á point flottant | 547.2 gflops versus 240.0 gflops |
Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 128 versus 119 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4596 versus 2602 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.593 versus 6.901 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.852 versus 0.587 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.789 versus 10.121 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 49.196 versus 22.755 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2401 versus 2035 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2401 versus 2035 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M
- Environ 10% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 938 MHz versus 855 MHz
- Environ 60% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1600 MHz versus 1000 MHz
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 460 versus 414
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 146.913 versus 143.386
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1047 versus 985
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2570 versus 1927
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1047 versus 985
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2570 versus 1927
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse augmenté | 938 MHz versus 855 MHz |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1600 MHz versus 1000 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 460 versus 414 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 146.913 versus 143.386 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1047 versus 985 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2570 versus 1927 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1047 versus 985 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2570 versus 1927 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 M230
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon R5 M230 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 414 | 460 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 128 | 119 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4596 | 2602 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.593 | 6.901 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 143.386 | 146.913 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.852 | 0.587 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.789 | 10.121 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 49.196 | 22.755 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 985 | 1047 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1927 | 2570 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2401 | 2035 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 985 | 1047 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1927 | 2570 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2401 | 2035 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon R5 M230 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
Nom de code | Jet | GF117 |
Conception | AMD Radeon R5 200 Series | |
Date de sortie | 7 January 2014 | 1 April 2013 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1441 | 1444 |
Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 855 MHz | 938 MHz |
Unités de Compute | 5 | |
Vitesse du noyau | 825 MHz | 775 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 547.2 gflops | 240.0 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 320 | 96 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 17.1 GTexel / s | 12.4 GTexel / s |
Compte de transistor | 1,040 million | 585 million |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 2560x1600 | |
Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 2560x1600 | |
Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCI Express 2.0 |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 11 | 12 API |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | 1.1 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 16 GB/s | 12.8 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 bit | 64 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1000 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Configuration standard de la mémoire | DDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
DualGraphics | ||
Enduro | ||
HD3D | ||
Powerplay | ||
PowerTune | ||
Graphiques changeables | ||
ZeroCore | ||
Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
CUDA | ||
Direct Compute | ||
FXAA | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus |