AMD Radeon R7 250E versus NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R7 250E and NVIDIA Quadro K4100M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R7 250E
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 mois plus tard
- Environ 13% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 800 MHz versus 706 MHz
- Environ 82% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 55 Watt versus 100 Watt
- Environ 41% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 4500 MHz versus 3200 MHz
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 38.669 versus 35.452
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 98.052 versus 61.984
- 2.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2873 versus 1105
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3698 versus 1974
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 versus 3246
- 2.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2873 versus 1105
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3698 versus 1974
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 versus 3246
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 20 December 2013 versus 23 July 2013 |
Vitesse du noyau | 800 MHz versus 706 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt versus 100 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 4500 MHz versus 3200 MHz |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.669 versus 35.452 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 98.052 versus 61.984 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2873 versus 1105 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 versus 1974 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 versus 3246 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2873 versus 1105 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 versus 1974 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 versus 3246 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 67.78 GTexel / s versus 25.6 GTexel / s
- 2.3x plus de pipelines: 1152 versus 512
- Environ 99% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,627 gflops versus 819.2 gflops
- 4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 1 GB
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 24.487 versus 21.562
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 600.985 versus 582.073
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.281 versus 2.2
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 67.78 GTexel / s versus 25.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1152 versus 512 |
Performance á point flottant | 1,627 gflops versus 819.2 gflops |
Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 1 GB |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.487 versus 21.562 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 600.985 versus 582.073 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.281 versus 2.2 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 250E
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon R7 250E | NVIDIA Quadro K4100M |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.562 | 24.487 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 582.073 | 600.985 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.2 | 2.281 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.669 | 35.452 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 98.052 | 61.984 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2873 | 1105 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 | 1974 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3246 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2873 | 1105 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 | 1974 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3246 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2756 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 328 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8855 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon R7 250E | NVIDIA Quadro K4100M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
Nom de code | Cape Verde | GK104 |
Date de sortie | 20 December 2013 | 23 July 2013 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $109 | $1,499 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1083 | 1084 |
Genre | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Prix maintenant | $379.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 9.50 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 800 MHz | 706 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 819.2 gflops | 1,627 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 1152 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 25.6 GTexel / s | 67.78 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt | 100 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 1,500 million | 3,540 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Longeur | 168 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Taille du laptop | large | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 72 GB / s | 102.4 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 4500 MHz | 3200 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |