AMD Radeon R7 350 versus AMD Radeon R7 260X
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R7 350 and AMD Radeon R7 260X pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R7 350
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 8 mois plus tard
- 2.1x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 55 Watt versus 115 Watt
| Date de sortie | 6 July 2016 versus 8 October 2013 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt versus 115 Watt |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R7 260X
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 61.6 GTexel / s versus 25.6 GTexel / s
- Environ 75% de pipelines plus haut: 896 versus 512
- 2.4x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,971 gflops versus 819.2 gflops
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
- Environ 71% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 43.745 versus 25.508
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 804.436 versus 647.813
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.673 versus 2.72
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 64.088 versus 44.6
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 221.539 versus 109.558
- Environ 86% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3845 versus 2072
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3485 versus 3122
- Environ 86% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3845 versus 2072
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3485 versus 3122
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 61.6 GTexel / s versus 25.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 896 versus 512 |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,971 gflops versus 819.2 gflops |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 43.745 versus 25.508 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 804.436 versus 647.813 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.673 versus 2.72 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 64.088 versus 44.6 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 221.539 versus 109.558 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3845 versus 2072 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3485 versus 3122 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3845 versus 2072 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3485 versus 3122 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 350
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 260X
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon R7 350 | AMD Radeon R7 260X |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7787 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.508 | 43.745 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 647.813 | 804.436 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.72 | 3.673 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 44.6 | 64.088 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 109.558 | 221.539 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2072 | 3845 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3122 | 3485 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2072 | 3845 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3122 | 3485 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3358 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3192 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 523 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1481 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon R7 350 | AMD Radeon R7 260X | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 2.0 |
| Nom de code | Cape Verde | Bonaire |
| Date de sortie | 6 July 2016 | 8 October 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1083 | 614 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Conception | AMD Radeon R7 200 Series | |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $139 | |
| Prix maintenant | $239 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 17.15 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 800 MHz | |
| Performance á point flottant | 819.2 gflops | 1,971 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 512 | 896 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 25.6 GTexel / s | 61.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt | 115 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,500 million | 2,080 million |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1000 MHz | |
| Stream Processors | 896 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 168 mm | 170 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1 x 6-pin |
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 72 GB / s | 104 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4500 MHz | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon R7 350 avec des autres
AMDRadeon R7 350 vs
ATIRadeon 9100
AMDRadeon R7 350 vs
ATIRadeon 9800 XT
AMDRadeon R7 350 vs
AMDFirePro M4150
AMDRadeon R7 350 vs
IntelIris Graphics 6100
AMDRadeon R7 350 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M500M
AMDRadeon R7 350 vs
IntelUHD Graphics P630
